Jump to content


Replying to Get rid of artillery and push back speeders in the tech tree


Post Options

    • Can't make it out? Click here to generate a new image

  or Cancel


Topic Summary

Posted 30 March 2017 - 12:17 AM

AT-AA sucks, buff them and all is good

Posted 30 March 2017 - 12:16 AM

AT-AA sucks, buff them and all is good

keraunos

Posted 31 July 2008 - 02:44 PM

Good idea :xcahik_: We can start new topic on the subject :blush: I'll be able to play next week, but I don't know when exactly.

anakinskysolo

Posted 30 July 2008 - 01:08 AM

Well, I liked it as well, before I've played FoC :shiftee:. Still, I find it difficult to say it's canon ;) Since FoC, it's simply impossible to go back - I rather try to beat Conquerors on hard ;)


Out of topic: Maybe we can arrange for a multiplayer?

Kaleb Graff

Posted 30 July 2008 - 01:00 AM

I agree with you on GB. Still, what will artillery look like?

keraunos

Posted 30 July 2008 - 12:12 AM

Well, I liked it as well, before I've played FoC :shiftee:. Still, I find it difficult to say it's canon ;) Since FoC, it's simply impossible to go back - I rather try to beat Conquerors on hard ;)

anakinskysolo

Posted 29 July 2008 - 10:29 PM

Believe me, I have played it, and its just like a Star Wars Age of Empires, but I still like it. The problem now is that it doesn't run on Vista.

keraunos

Posted 29 July 2008 - 09:48 PM

Well, if you consider Battlefront non-canonical, you definitely should play Galactic Battlegrounds :grin:

Phoenix Rising

Posted 29 July 2008 - 02:31 AM

No, but they're really not in any game that I can think of. As far as I know, PR is the first that doesn't water down capitals.

anakinskysolo

Posted 29 July 2008 - 01:53 AM

I didn't say they were fake, as I didn't say that the ISD in the game is fake, but the characteristics of the units, for example the speed and damage that they do, are not well represented in EaW.

Review the complete topic (launches new window)