Replying to Get rid of artillery and push back speeders in the tech tree
Topic Summary
Posted 30 March 2017 - 12:17 AM
AT-AA sucks, buff them and all is good
Posted 30 March 2017 - 12:16 AM
AT-AA sucks, buff them and all is good
keraunos
Posted 31 July 2008 - 02:44 PM
Good idea We can start new topic on the subject I'll be able to play next week, but I don't know when exactly.
anakinskysolo
Posted 30 July 2008 - 01:08 AM
Well, I liked it as well, before I've played FoC . Still, I find it difficult to say it's canon Since FoC, it's simply impossible to go back - I rather try to beat Conquerors on hard
Out of topic: Maybe we can arrange for a multiplayer?
Kaleb Graff
Posted 30 July 2008 - 01:00 AM
I agree with you on GB. Still, what will artillery look like?
keraunos
Posted 30 July 2008 - 12:12 AM
Well, I liked it as well, before I've played FoC . Still, I find it difficult to say it's canon Since FoC, it's simply impossible to go back - I rather try to beat Conquerors on hard
anakinskysolo
Posted 29 July 2008 - 10:29 PM
Believe me, I have played it, and its just like a Star Wars Age of Empires, but I still like it. The problem now is that it doesn't run on Vista.
keraunos
Posted 29 July 2008 - 09:48 PM
Well, if you consider Battlefront non-canonical, you definitely should play Galactic Battlegrounds
Phoenix Rising
Posted 29 July 2008 - 02:31 AM
No, but they're really not in any game that I can think of. As far as I know, PR is the first that doesn't water down capitals.
anakinskysolo
Posted 29 July 2008 - 01:53 AM
I didn't say they were fake, as I didn't say that the ISD in the game is fake, but the characteristics of the units, for example the speed and damage that they do, are not well represented in EaW.