Entrenched
Started by
Mig Eater
, Sep 26 2008 04:09 PM
15 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:09 PM
I have mainly been focusing on code lately so not many pics but I have done some work on the allied buildings. My main attempts didn’t turn out too well (would fit in CR better etc) but I am very happy with how the defence buildings went. They have inspired me a bit & given me a base to work on for the main buildings.
30cal 7.62mm
M5 76mm
M2 90mm
M2 155mm "Long Tom"
Vickers 7.7mm
17pdr
Bofors 40mm
BL 5.5'
Both the M5 76mm & the M2 155mm can be undeployed & towed to a different position which is an American speciality.
30cal 7.62mm
M5 76mm
M2 90mm
M2 155mm "Long Tom"
Vickers 7.7mm
17pdr
Bofors 40mm
BL 5.5'
Both the M5 76mm & the M2 155mm can be undeployed & towed to a different position which is an American speciality.
#2
Posted 26 September 2008 - 05:25 PM
still,they look pretty darn good.
#3
Posted 26 September 2008 - 05:26 PM
AS Always, Nice worked Mig
Btw are those defense structure fire automatically, if it is... well it looks weird without a infantry standing beside it. how about add a unit or two so it looks someone is firing it
Btw are those defense structure fire automatically, if it is... well it looks weird without a infantry standing beside it. how about add a unit or two so it looks someone is firing it
#5
Posted 26 September 2008 - 06:08 PM
They look very nice. Does the turrets rotate? Otherwise it looks lame.
#7
Posted 26 September 2008 - 07:50 PM
Another thing, could you show the pictures of your building attempt?
#8
Posted 27 September 2008 - 07:54 PM
Those defences look pretty good , quite like all the little details such as the logo and the little crates and barrels.
#9
Posted 28 September 2008 - 07:39 AM
I like the sandbags, but I'm not so sure about the .30 cal's little bunkers though
maybe it's perspective but it looks a little deformed?
Nice touch with the fixed guns how they're dug in and the US have their towing vehicles nearby, but how will it work if they need to fire "behind" them, won't they just turn and shoot through the parked tractor?
maybe it's perspective but it looks a little deformed?
Nice touch with the fixed guns how they're dug in and the US have their towing vehicles nearby, but how will it work if they need to fire "behind" them, won't they just turn and shoot through the parked tractor?
apologising to the world on behalf of my country for the existence of Brussel sprouts and Jean Claude Vandame
"I'm not retreating, I'm just fighting in another direction" (anonymous US corporal, Korea)
work is sacred...so don't go near it.
"I'm not retreating, I'm just fighting in another direction" (anonymous US corporal, Korea)
work is sacred...so don't go near it.
#11
Posted 01 October 2008 - 01:38 AM
Mig, how about you put some sort of a canopy tent on top of those so it'll look better, hence it won't need the eyecandy of an infantry manning it.
#12
Posted 01 October 2008 - 01:50 PM
This is maybie the wrong topic, but mehh. Are you going to do this Super Heavy Tank?
#13
Posted 01 October 2008 - 04:16 PM
Looks like a tuna can fashioned with a turret to me.
#15
Posted 02 October 2008 - 10:06 AM
btw, do the brits still get the Dorchester command truck that was going to act as a mini MCV, I can see loads of potential fun setting up shop close to the enemy base with the 5 inch guns and 17 pounders thanks to them
apologising to the world on behalf of my country for the existence of Brussel sprouts and Jean Claude Vandame
"I'm not retreating, I'm just fighting in another direction" (anonymous US corporal, Korea)
work is sacred...so don't go near it.
"I'm not retreating, I'm just fighting in another direction" (anonymous US corporal, Korea)
work is sacred...so don't go near it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users