A little something
#1
Posted 25 May 2006 - 06:27 AM
Japanese R2Y1 Keiun
Japanese Yamato
Russian T-54 mod.47
I was going to work on the Jap naval units but I’m not really in the mood for such large voxels atm. I’ve been itching to make the T-54 for a while now tho, cant wait to make the AMX-13 & Centurion too The T-35, Pzkfw III, Matilda, M3 Lee & R35 are at the top of my to do list as well.
#2
Posted 25 May 2006 - 06:40 AM
#3
Posted 25 May 2006 - 07:18 AM
Yamato: you can see the deck, are you sure theres enough AA on it?
T54: What DaEmONuL said
World Domination Status: ▾2.7%
#5
Posted 25 May 2006 - 07:35 AM
would be nice to see the R35 and matilda, it's been a while since brits and frogs got new toys
(relatively speaking)
"I'm not retreating, I'm just fighting in another direction" (anonymous US corporal, Korea)
work is sacred...so don't go near it.
#7
Posted 25 May 2006 - 09:09 AM
#8
Posted 25 May 2006 - 09:32 AM
Yamato: you can see the deck, are you sure theres enough AA on it?
ROFL, words to live by!
"They couldn't hit an elephant from this dist-"
#10
Posted 25 May 2006 - 07:03 PM
Edited by DAA, 26 May 2006 - 12:06 AM.
#11
Posted 29 May 2006 - 09:46 PM
Cock-sucking over, I'm deeply curious as to how you'll impliment the T-35 and M3 Lee weapons systems, considering the Ra2 engine was never meant for multiple turrets or turrets mized with hull cannons. Not to say you can't pull it off, I just want to wet my lips with the secrets of Migeater.
Yamato: you can see the deck, are you sure theres enough AA on it?
This comment may be true as anything, but it's also a rather sad...
#12
Posted 30 May 2006 - 12:16 AM
On tanks with multiple turrets I just use the main turret & leave the rest fixed to the hull. I was planning to make such tanks as the M3 & Char B1 deploy & then use the secondary weapon in their hull a bit like the TS tick tank.
#13
Posted 30 May 2006 - 12:49 AM
On tanks with multiple turrets I just use the main turret & leave the rest fixed to the hull. I was planning to make such tanks as the M3 & Char B1 deploy & then use the secondary weapon in their hull a bit like the TS tick tank.
Ah, good idea. I would talk to Holy_master if I were you. He managed to use some logic from the seige chopper so that the unit deploys directly into another unit, capable of turning and I believe moving.
Best of luck with the mod.
#14
Posted 30 May 2006 - 12:25 PM
2,yamato is fine, but i can't see it significantly larger than BB Iowa class. it's coz the pic size or it is just not bigger?
3, about the Multi Gun Turrets, it's a good idea to have Char B1 a deployable unit. BUT M3 is different, it lives on its SPEED, isn't it?
so i suggest M3 like this: no turret. it's main gun as a hull gun, and it's smaller turret gun as a Omnifire=yes weapon. as the M3 turret and turret gun is very small, you can't tell whether it's really turning without watching carefully. i think it seems like the M3 in real life better.
and to make it better, you can make the M3 turret as a sector of the M3.vxl, then edit HVA to make it turning left and right while running or firing.
again, Best of luck with the mod.
to Rattuskid: the seige chopper logic you metioned is very interesting! we can finally have something like Transformers and Marcross! could you plz post it somewhere?
Edited by LEGO, 30 May 2006 - 01:30 PM.
#15
Posted 31 May 2006 - 07:15 AM
I like the "deploy to fire hull gun" idea too.
"I'm not retreating, I'm just fighting in another direction" (anonymous US corporal, Korea)
work is sacred...so don't go near it.
#17
Posted 31 May 2006 - 03:10 PM
Paradox @ Ali - "And what the fuck would you know? Ever been? Oh no, sorry, your map says 'HERE BE DRAGONS' anywhere outside of your rock"
#18
Posted 31 May 2006 - 11:39 PM
@LEGO:
1) It was called the T-54 even then (I dont see why it shouldn't of have )
2) There is a limit to how big you can make voxels & both are at that limit.
3) Sounds like a good idea
well I thought the Russia tank type number was it designed (or designation finnished year, or entered serviece) year? am I wrong?
(one exeption would be T-34, as it was first developed in 1934, but delayed coz of the Great Purge)
about that Big ships, yes I didn't notice there is a limit. but is the HVA editor also this size limited? how about make it 2 sectors, and fix the HVA to assemble them? then we can have Whatever Big project
#19
Posted 01 June 2006 - 12:12 AM
Your idea with the HVA doesn't work either, it was the fist thing I tried many a year ago.
BTW I removed the spam/flames, I’m running a hardliner policy about this now so anything like that in the future will be immediately deleted.
#20
Posted 01 June 2006 - 12:28 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users