Jump to content


Photo

Why is MO set in the 80s rather than 70s?

question

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 MarqFJA87

MarqFJA87
  • Members
  • 10 posts
  • Location:Saudi Arabia

Posted 18 July 2019 - 05:56 PM

RA2 (and by proxy, YR) is implicitly set in the 1970s, since the ending cutscene for the Allied campaign shows a magazine cover that features a photo of Tanya's capture of Romanov with the date "31 July 1972". And MO is explicitly set in 1982, as the wiki article for the Third Great War shows. What I don't see ever explained is why the date was moved 10 years forward.



#2 Zharakov

Zharakov
  • Members
  • 143 posts
  •  Everyone dies....But not everyone truly LIVES

Posted 24 July 2019 - 03:36 PM

Perhaps more preperation? After all the allies were alot more stronger and well defended compared to vanilla ra2 that even the joint Russia-Chinese invasion of UK failed.

#3 Moonreaper666

Moonreaper666
  • Members
  • 63 posts

Posted 12 January 2020 - 07:19 PM

RA2 (and by proxy, YR) is implicitly set in the 1970s, since the ending cutscene for the Allied campaign shows a magazine cover that features a photo of Tanya's capture of Romanov with the date "31 July 1972". And MO is explicitly set in 1982, as the wiki article for the Third Great War shows. What I don't see ever explained is why the date was moved 10 years forward.


Three reasons. First is that Einstein is dead and without him there is no time machine

Second is that the Soviets and Epsilon are more powerful

Third, certain subfactions would not exist or have an army (Latin Confederation, Pacific Front, Scorpion Cell). Rather than have the USA and Russia be the face of the conflict as in the vanilla game




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users