Jump to content


Photo

Need CNOnline_2.0.7.msi to uninstall CNC online


Best Answer astra1993, 01 April 2025 - 12:10 PM

It is possible to use the wayback machine to download the file, if it is still necessary for you.
https://web.archive....nline_2.0.7.msi

 

Use it to uninstall and then install Tacitus.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 samikaz

samikaz
  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 11 March 2025 - 02:39 PM

Hello here,

 

I am trying to uninstall CNC online but I need the MSI file as per picture.

 

Seems like the MSI file has been removed entirely. COuld some share it with me?

 

Regards

 

 



#2 shadow147

shadow147
  • New Members
  • 14 posts

Posted 11 March 2025 - 03:54 PM

https://forums.revor...er-version-207/

 

4th post



#3 samikaz

samikaz
  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 12 March 2025 - 08:21 PM

hello, thanks but all the link in that post are dead.



#4 shadow147

shadow147
  • New Members
  • 14 posts

Posted 12 March 2025 - 09:38 PM

I found it. Need a minute to verify checksums to make sure it hasn't been tampered with.

 

Edit: Sent a link, and verification checksums as a private message.


Edited by shadow147, 12 March 2025 - 09:46 PM.


#5 astra1993

astra1993
  • Project Team
  • 244 posts

Posted 01 April 2025 - 12:10 PM   Best Answer

It is possible to use the wayback machine to download the file, if it is still necessary for you.
https://web.archive....nline_2.0.7.msi

 

Use it to uninstall and then install Tacitus.



#6 shadow147

shadow147
  • New Members
  • 14 posts

Posted 05 April 2025 - 11:03 AM

Make sure the checksum matches when downloading from unofficial sources:

 

SHA256
b9912c97500f7e4ded5a7e343fb97d71620d0e8c69837c3d1063ef90d79dde67 CNCOnline_2.0.7.msi



#7 astra1993

astra1993
  • Project Team
  • 244 posts

Posted 05 April 2025 - 01:06 PM

Make sure the checksum matches when downloading from unofficial sources:

 

SHA256
b9912c97500f7e4ded5a7e343fb97d71620d0e8c69837c3d1063ef90d79dde67 CNCOnline_2.0.7.msi

It is not an unofficial source.

To be more specific: If I'd uploaded the file myself to a third party file sharing service or sent it through a private message, it would be an "unofficial source". The `Archive.org` Wayback Machine does not function like that, meaning that I have not uploaded the file, but it's rather scraped from the original site by their web scraping bots. But in either case using a hash for integrity verification would only be useful if the hash's value was acquired from the original website. Since a third party can tamper with the file and then also give the new hash as the correct hash. And since the original website never provided hashes for integrity verification, the hashes provided by others (me included) will all be considered unofficial hashes.

But apart from all of this, in the grand scheme of things, hashes are not the best tools to utilize for tamper-resistance. Digital signatures are. Hashes are mostly used to verify the integrity of the file from a correctness perspective (that it wasn't corrupted during the download process), not from a security perspective.


Edited by astra1993, 05 April 2025 - 01:33 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users