Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Side Logos

Started by Mastermind, Oct 29 2004 10:02 PM

Please log in to reply

4 replies to this topic

#1 Mastermind

Server Technician

Undead
7,014 posts

Location:Cambridge, MA
Projects:MasterNews 3
The Man Behind the Curtain

Posted 29 October 2004 - 10:02 PM

Today is a bit slow in the media blitz. All you get today are the logos of the two sides. They were both done by spyVspy, and look excellent.

I apologize for the lack of media, but don't worry, the wait will be worth it.

Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.

Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |

Back to top

#2 Guest_Guest_*

Guests

Posted 30 October 2004 - 12:27 AM

Nice ones; very unique.

Back to top

#3 Guest_Guest_*

Guests

Posted 30 October 2004 - 01:57 PM

I realy like the Ebres logos looks great

but I must say that I am a bit disapointed of the Aerosiam one (I had expected som form of asian dragon or somthing)

Back to top

#4 Natus

i maid a telescope with my smarties toob

Project Team
2,005 posts

Location:Frasier Crane's apartment
Projects:Ex mapper, GCII Fanatic and sound tech.
"Go fudge yourself you smarmy overly-camp handsome barstard" - Neil Faz

Posted 30 October 2004 - 08:04 PM

Sharp work. Like em.

Natus 3.4

Corrupt program now requires constant reboots and does not function at all in majority of instances. Designed with a web browser component to replace AOL, it has exceeded our expectations by being more crashy and unreliable and with worse tech support. We didn't think it was physically possible! A general product recall is advised; when it does function it seems to require background processes Girl 0.1Beta to stave off further crashes. Will someone PLEASE remove that code, and insert Backbone 1.9 in its place? That's assuming we even bother to continue this prog.