Well Hostile, I'm in the guild since its genesis and I made the rules of this section. So I talk politely with you because you need to calm down and try demonstrate every point with proves. Avoid pitiful language and shameful sarcasm please.
Do you want to know where am I from? I'm from Europe, like many of these members and we aren't anti American because our anti war point of view.
If you don't have a clue but you want an opinion about the disaster of middle east please get some decen information instead of insult people who has reasons to say what they say.
Bush administration decided to invade the Iraq without any concrete prove about weapons of mass distruction (the only valid reason to use the force), they violated the UN resolution and create a dummy coalition to have a poor justification for their invasion. Plans of invading Iraq were ready years before the 9-11 because Iraq is a strategic place for lots of reason:
1)Control of the middle east and possible key poin to isolate the other 3 superpowers, Russia, China, India.
2)Iraq is the second oil resource in the world, controll it means have the power to decide the price of oil.
3)Iraq is a huge business to control the water resources and take the contract to rebluild, making lots of money for every coroporation involved in this business.
4)With "conquered" Iraq the US can establish new bases and start new wars in the middle east
Off course President Bush hides to his people the true reasons of the conflict giving pitiful motivations like "war against terrorism, war for democracy" and other old lies...
But this was the theory....what's happening in Iraq is a bit different. Even the most powerful army has serious troubles with a non conventional force like guerrilla, kamikaze attacks, psycological and mediatic war (hostages in TV, photos about tortures in prisons, etc...) , this means billions of dollars wasted, at least 100000 civilian Iraqi died becasue US bombers destroyed schools, hospitals, houses, markets etc... growing the anti us sentiment in the people; over 1375 us soldiers dead and the casualities grow day by day.
I'm not going to call you infedel, there are enough neo-conservative fanatics in your countriy who call "sons of Satan" the muslims or every "non-christian" people in the earth. Yes, ask the 98% of the people who don't have now neither water or electricity in their bombed houses, the situation after Saddam is even worse then before. We are talking about the most blatant violation of human rights and violation of international conventions, we are talking about people died because depleted uranium fired by US tanks or planes, we are talking about shocked soldiers with serious mental problems because they aren't able to come back in a normal life. Read the other threads in this forum to have a clue about what we are talking about.
If a dictator is in power no country has the right to remove him. Why don't the US has invaded Sudan, or Birmania, or South America or other Banana Republics? Because there's no concrete business for US. With Saddam in power there weren't internal conflicts because Iraq is full of different cultures and ideologies in open conflict with eachothers, now without Saddam there's only chaos and terror everywhere. Noone is safe anymore, well congratulations with this democracy brought by bombs.
Tired of this idiotic idealogy of American "killing the poor innocent" We didn't kill civilians, if they died they did by accident enroute to the enemy. For God's sake would you have said the same if the US invaded Nazi Germany?
This argument is so childish that doesn't deserve an answer. Think before you post other similar garbage. How the hell can Iraq be a "threat for the world" if has suffered embargo for 12 years and was costantly bombed by US planes in the no fly zone?
Next time you want to answer free your mind from all the neo-conservative brainwash and look at this situation with serious criticism, thanks
nothing like a riot now and then...
