north korea has nukes.
#1
Posted 13 February 2005 - 05:49 PM
#2
Posted 13 February 2005 - 05:51 PM
#3
Posted 13 February 2005 - 05:55 PM
I smell bullshit. George has not been using our nukes in any war. He's used them as a reason for war, but we aren't using them. I don't see any reason North Korea needs nukes. It's not like they would do much good if we wanted to attack. They could maybe hit the west coast of the US, and we would do everything possible to destroy them first.Well done dip shit. THey've had nukes ages. I don't feel sorry for SK. NK is only protecting themselves from america and george but they are pretty much the same. Both George and NK believe the only way to grant national security is through having Nukes. Difference is george has been using them in his wars and NK hasn't.
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#4
Posted 13 February 2005 - 05:58 PM
Well done dip shit. THey've had nukes ages. I don't feel sorry for SK. NK is only protecting themselves from america and george but they are pretty much the same. Both George and NK believe the only way to grant national security is through having Nukes. Difference is george has been using them in his wars and NK hasn't.
no, they've been trying to get nukes, they just got them duh.
#5
Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:00 PM
Heres some evidence: http://www.ericblumrich.com/pl_lo.html
It's sick.
NK is scared of the US and feel they have to protect themselves with nukes. George is scared of everything because hes a republician. I don't blame him, he should be scared, everyone hates him. So hes still developing nukes for national security as he can't really defend his nation, not that he cares anyway. As long as hes ok and can get his money from wherever he needs it.
#6
Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:04 PM
They are called Mininukes. The bunker busting bombs that spawn radiation into the earth and soil.
Heres some evidence: http://www.ericblumrich.com/pl_lo.html
It's sick.
NK is scared of the US and feel they have to protect themselves with nukes. George is scared of everything because hes a republician. I don't blame him, he should be scared, everyone hates him. So hes still developing nukes for national security as he can't really defend his nation, not that he cares anyway. As long as hes ok and can get his money from wherever he needs it.
so nukes did that to those people? my mom got mad when I watched that.
#7
Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:07 PM
#8
Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:15 PM
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#9
Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:20 PM
#10
Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:22 PM
An interview including a full report on the effects of DU. It's 40% less radioactive than normal Uranium. The only location after the Iraq war that showed a serious level of elevated radiation was the "boneyard" where all of the tanks that were destroyed were collected. Even the areas with runoff were considered safe based on US standards for the use and occupation of the land.
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#11
Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:36 PM
Thats still classed as chemical warefare in my opinion and illegal.
Why the hell are they using uranium when they were supposably there to get 1 man out... Supposably being the key word.
#12
Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:43 PM
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#13
Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:02 PM
The war started in March 2003, almost 4 years after that date. Sure it highlights the new stuff bush is using? Most likely not. Considering Bush is very carefully controlling all areas of the media and government organisations you will never get the truth. That document is unreliable for today.
#14
Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:06 PM
DU is by far the most effective metal for use as a Kinetic energy penetrator. It is part of what accounts for the high effectiveness of the US military. DU rounds are very unlikely to shatter like the normal Tungsten penetrators. Tungsten is also a heavy metal, and has many of the same issues as the use of lead does. Studies have so far shown only a slight increase in the risk of cancer from exposure to DU. It is well within what is considered safe radiation.
Who cares? There are people dieing of cancer caused at Iraq by this thing, including american soldiers who launched these weapons...
Command & Conquer Mods, Mods Support, Public Researchs, Map Archives, Tutorials, Tools, A Friendly Community and much more. Check it out now!
#15
Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:30 PM
#16
Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:35 PM
I still have seen no proof that those deformations are in Iraq, or caused by DU. Depleted Uranium is not used in most bombs (it may be used in bunker busters, I'm not sure). It is only used in tank shells. From what I've seen there are still no firm statistics showing that the use of DU has a significant effect on the cancer rate, or any other appreciable long term effects.Slightly is enough to cause all that deformation? That thing you posted is dated Thursday, April 15, 1999 - 1:30 p.m.
The war started in March 2003, almost 4 years after that date. Sure it highlights the new stuff bush is using? Most likely not. Considering Bush is very carefully controlling all areas of the media and government organisations you will never get the truth. That document is unreliable for today.
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#17
Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:41 PM
#18
Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:52 PM
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#19
Posted 13 February 2005 - 08:03 PM
Lead doesn't spawn radiativity (no matter how small or large) like Uranium (no matter what type it does) into dust clouds. These clouds then pollute anything from water to the air breathed. Even if its only .07% of normal fullblown uranium it will still cause damage to human beings. Cancer and deformation. All thats needed to start cancer is literally one cell and it can begin to spread like hell. Depends what the mutated cell does, whether it just dies or becomes a tumor. The uranium used is still and will still cause damage no matter how big or how small.
#20
Posted 13 February 2005 - 08:46 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users