Jump to content


Photo

north korea has nukes.


  • Please log in to reply
103 replies to this topic

#21 Tom

Tom

    title available

  • Undead
  • 8,475 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Projects:Life
  •  Co-Founder of Revora

Posted 13 February 2005 - 09:38 PM

Its what will make them most profit, not for the safety of their country...

#22 MSpencer

MSpencer

    Think Tank... Legend?

  • Hosted
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Montreal, QC
  • Projects:Admin @ Meaaov Gaming, university studies, ugh... research. GNP's Flagship of the Left.
  •  Angry, angry bastard.

Posted 13 February 2005 - 10:19 PM

Depends what the mutated cell does

And when did you get your doctorate and get the right to say something as fact on a topic that is clearly being debated by medical professionals worldwide?
Posted Image
My Favorite Website.My UniversityAnd... Mein Kampf?
C. elegans for President

#23 Comrade Kal

Comrade Kal

    Blur are better than Oasis

  • Members
  • 2,491 posts
  • Location:A small town in an archipelago in northwest Europe
  • Projects:The revolution
  •  Terrorist

Posted 13 February 2005 - 11:54 PM

Same place you got yours. Assuming you have one, of course.
Posted Image

"To be governed is tragic, to govern is pathetic."

#24 radaral

radaral

    title available

  • Members
  • 277 posts

Posted 13 February 2005 - 11:59 PM

Does anyone find it just as ironic as I do that the US is taking less actions towards NK that certainly has nuclear weapons then towards Iran where there is only a suspicion..

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I think george bush is afraid of kim jong il, I wouldn't blame him hes creepy.

Posted Image

I mean look at him hes scary, I bet little kids would pee there pants if he went trick ot treating in someones town and without a costom too.

that and china would probably defend north korea like they always do.

#25 MSpencer

MSpencer

    Think Tank... Legend?

  • Hosted
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Montreal, QC
  • Projects:Admin @ Meaaov Gaming, university studies, ugh... research. GNP's Flagship of the Left.
  •  Angry, angry bastard.

Posted 14 February 2005 - 12:22 AM

Such biased and close-minded views are the basis of hatred, and misunderstanding.
Posted Image
My Favorite Website.My UniversityAnd... Mein Kampf?
C. elegans for President

#26 radaral

radaral

    title available

  • Members
  • 277 posts

Posted 14 February 2005 - 12:27 AM

Such biased and close-minded views are the basis of hatred, and misunderstanding.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


who are you saying this to? :p

#27 MSpencer

MSpencer

    Think Tank... Legend?

  • Hosted
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Montreal, QC
  • Projects:Admin @ Meaaov Gaming, university studies, ugh... research. GNP's Flagship of the Left.
  •  Angry, angry bastard.

Posted 14 February 2005 - 03:00 AM

Both of you.
Posted Image
My Favorite Website.My UniversityAnd... Mein Kampf?
C. elegans for President

#28 chemical ali

chemical ali

    Pie! Be nice I'm staff and I can ban0rz j00!

  • Members
  • 4,739 posts
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • Projects:building an empire of doom
  •  chief mischief maker

Posted 14 February 2005 - 10:35 AM

Right DU was found in order to counter act what the Soviets had at their time with their nuclear technology and how they were putting it into tanks, like anything radioactive it is dangerous, those photos in that flash video are from what looks like Cheynoble from medical problems that happened there. The UK and the US have had a active weapon programe with Britains Portland Down and the US Nevara test sites, North Korea has an active nuclear aresenal when they begin testing it that is when the worry is, Iran could have nukes this year, thats why if I was an Israeli I would be worried.
Posted Image

Quotes
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”

"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel

Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56

#29 MSpencer

MSpencer

    Think Tank... Legend?

  • Hosted
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Montreal, QC
  • Projects:Admin @ Meaaov Gaming, university studies, ugh... research. GNP's Flagship of the Left.
  •  Angry, angry bastard.

Posted 14 February 2005 - 11:18 AM

Can you ever get anything right or are you just going to make stuff up again?
DU is quite simply the best penetrator you can find. DEPLETED uranium, as in no more electrons and protons being emitted to make it change into lead. The Soviets weren't putting nukes into their tanks, stop playing Generals. They did not put any radioactive material in their tanks (considering they lacked the NBC protection as well as the evil genius to do so, if they had put nuclear material in their tanks, all Soviet MBTs from the East German blitzkrieg line would be glowing with radioactivity, and millions would be dead and dying from exposure to radioactive material), and I have no idea where you got this backward notion from. Did NATO use DU penetrators? Yes, because it will punch through the front of basically 90% of all tanks in existance. Also, it's not just NATO. Russia uses DU rounds for their tanks, primarily with their 115mm and 125mm guns.
Know what you are talking about before you make statements that could be outclassed by a two year old. Stop making things up.
Posted Image
My Favorite Website.My UniversityAnd... Mein Kampf?
C. elegans for President

#30 Guest_ImmoMan_*

Guest_ImmoMan_*
  • Guests

Posted 14 February 2005 - 03:08 PM

Sorry, but there is no such thing as non-radioactive uranium. If you don't understand what depleted uranium is, let me explain...

Natural uranium metal is made of several isotopes of the same element. Uranium-238 is the most common, and makes up about 99.3% of all natural uranium. It has a half-life of 4.5 billion years. Uranium-235 is the isotope that's used for nuclear fission reactions, since it is most suitable for that process. It makes up no more than 0.72% of natural uranium, and has a half-life of 703 million years. Finally, uranium-234 makes up only 0.054% of natural uranium, but has a half-life of 244 thousand years.

Now, because uranium-235 is so valuable in the fission process, natural uranium is put through a process that increases the amount of uranium-235 in a piece of uranium. The result is called enriched uranium, which is made up of about 90% uranium-235. Of course the uranium-235 has to come from somewhere, so you're also left with a very large amount of metal that contains less uranium-235 than normal. This is called depleted uranium.

Both enriched uranium and depleted uranium are radioactive. Both contain all 3 isotopes, and all 3 are unstable and therefore radioactive. Enriched uranium is about four times as radioactive as normal uranium, but there is no difference in radioactivity between natural and depleted uranium. So it's just as deadly. Having an area spread with depleted uranium bullets would almost certainly cause severe damage to an area over the years. The stuff poisons the ground air, plants and wildlife for years to come.

#31 chemical ali

chemical ali

    Pie! Be nice I'm staff and I can ban0rz j00!

  • Members
  • 4,739 posts
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • Projects:building an empire of doom
  •  chief mischief maker

Posted 14 February 2005 - 03:47 PM

Spence if you said that in my country (or anywhere else in the world for that matter) you wouldnt even have to wait six seconds for someone to slap you and call be called a little facist. Everything you say is about how America does no damage and all the Iraqis love you and how your defeating terrorism. Where do you get your information from Fox News?
Posted Image

Quotes
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”

"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel

Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56

#32 Hostile

Hostile

    Benefitting Humanity Simply by Showing Up!

  • Veterans
  • 9,551 posts
  • Location:Washington DC
  •  T3A Founder
  • Division:Revora
  • Job:Global Administrator
  • Donated
  • Association

Posted 14 February 2005 - 04:30 PM

Getting back on topic. IMO I would think that China should have the most influence on the situation. If they threatened NK with sanctions, they should be able to get NK to break under pressure.

NK could not sustain itself without Chinese resources. Wiser people might convince me that would force NK to invade SK for it's own survival though.

#33 chemical ali

chemical ali

    Pie! Be nice I'm staff and I can ban0rz j00!

  • Members
  • 4,739 posts
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • Projects:building an empire of doom
  •  chief mischief maker

Posted 14 February 2005 - 04:41 PM

If China threatened sanctions then the North Koreans would just leave any attempt of resolving this peacfully, the chineese have to give North Korea grain and fuel as to just come along to the conferences.
Posted Image

Quotes
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”

"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel

Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56

#34 Mastermind

Mastermind

    Server Technician

  • Undead
  • 7,014 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, MA
  • Projects:MasterNews 3
  •  The Man Behind the Curtain

Posted 14 February 2005 - 05:26 PM

Both enriched uranium and depleted uranium are radioactive. Both contain all 3 isotopes, and all 3 are unstable and therefore radioactive. Enriched uranium is about four times as radioactive as normal uranium, but there is no difference in radioactivity between natural and depleted uranium. So it's just as deadly. Having an area spread with depleted uranium bullets would almost certainly cause severe damage to an area over the years. The stuff poisons the ground air, plants and wildlife for years to come.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

From what I've read, Depleted Uranium is about 40% less radioactive than normal uranium. Otherwise, you have it exactly right.
Posted Image

Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.

Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |

#35 Guest_ImmoMan_*

Guest_ImmoMan_*
  • Guests

Posted 14 February 2005 - 05:31 PM

It'll still poison you. :p

#36 Mastermind

Mastermind

    Server Technician

  • Undead
  • 7,014 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, MA
  • Projects:MasterNews 3
  •  The Man Behind the Curtain

Posted 14 February 2005 - 07:03 PM

You enhale natural uranium dust every day. It's a question of how much you are exposed to. Water will poison you, but that doesn't stop you from drinking it, does it?
Posted Image

Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.

Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |

#37 MSpencer

MSpencer

    Think Tank... Legend?

  • Hosted
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Montreal, QC
  • Projects:Admin @ Meaaov Gaming, university studies, ugh... research. GNP's Flagship of the Left.
  •  Angry, angry bastard.

Posted 14 February 2005 - 07:59 PM

But it's significantly less radioactive that unless you have direct contact with it, which is unlikely, you will not develop tumors from it. I still believe autoloaders should be used if using DU though.
Posted Image
My Favorite Website.My UniversityAnd... Mein Kampf?
C. elegans for President

#38 Tom

Tom

    title available

  • Undead
  • 8,475 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Projects:Life
  •  Co-Founder of Revora

Posted 14 February 2005 - 09:25 PM

Jesus, DU is radioactive. IT CAUSES CANCER AND MUTATIONS. Whether it is 40% less radioactive than normal uranium thats still 60% radioactivity. The point is it should not be used in any shells. It is classed as CHEMICAL WARFARE and as far as i know thats illegal in all forms.

Just because you guys are more worried about defending Americas reputation of being good rather than looking at the truth it doesn't mean that what is being said is untrue. This uranium will causes lot of damage in Iraq, it will just take more years before it becomes clearer what it is attually doing.

Getting back on topic. IMO I would think that China should have the most influence on the situation. If they threatened NK with sanctions, they should be able to get NK to break under pressure.


Else america could disarm like most of the other countries and stop being so hostile towards communism, THEN MAYBE we could convince NK to disarm as well. NK to me seems like a hidden and inactive cold war. Its just a way to defend themselves from what they see is a threat. America.

#39 MSpencer

MSpencer

    Think Tank... Legend?

  • Hosted
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Montreal, QC
  • Projects:Admin @ Meaaov Gaming, university studies, ugh... research. GNP's Flagship of the Left.
  •  Angry, angry bastard.

Posted 14 February 2005 - 09:32 PM

They can hit our coast with nuclear weapons. They can blow up Japan. They put American lives at danger in Japan, and threaten the security of the world. Kim Jom Il oppresses his people, and you defend him. You can really defend the man who develops nuclear weapons in this day and age, while starving his people? How can you live with yourself, really.
Posted Image
My Favorite Website.My UniversityAnd... Mein Kampf?
C. elegans for President

#40 Tom

Tom

    title available

  • Undead
  • 8,475 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Projects:Life
  •  Co-Founder of Revora

Posted 14 February 2005 - 09:41 PM

Not much different from what your doing then eh?

If you read what i said you will find the following: "THEN MAYBE we could convince NK to disarm as well"

THEN MAYBE is not certain. I just said something because its a possible possibility of why he is building Nukes. America has no reason to continue nuclear programs, however IT DOES. Problem are far deeper than what you think they are spence. Stop targeting stupid little mistakes you make mentally then throwing them at me. I DO NOT SUPPORT Kim Jom just like i don't support George W. Read what i said. If America was willing to disarm the MAYBE NK would be too. Wake up.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users