And on today's mod hater of the week: ACK!
#61
Posted 12 April 2005 - 09:05 PM
Not for everyone else.
#62 Guest_ImmoMan_*
Posted 12 April 2005 - 09:06 PM
#63
Posted 12 April 2005 - 09:14 PM
Now, how about those Beatles, what a good band
#64 Guest_ImmoMan_*
Posted 12 April 2005 - 09:22 PM
Just kidding.
#65
Posted 12 April 2005 - 09:32 PM
I just hope he has realised and learns from this, but knowing how stubbern he is, i doubt he will learn anything
As A Great man once said, "thank you very much!" and we should be hearing that from ACK, as we have shown him the light!
ohh and the Great Man was Elvis, not Gunnery Sargent Hartman ("Bullshit! i bet you could suck a golfball through a garden hose")
-Jakey (Rocks)
#66
Posted 12 April 2005 - 11:10 PM
What the hell, Immo, bring out the next double!
#67
Posted 12 April 2005 - 11:54 PM
I also recall a time when he would come into Black Cell servers and do nothing but be an team hampering ass, or use his little "hacks" for no reasonable reason.
He is also a self righteous bastard whom can not see his own flaws, Talking to him like talking to a mentally deficient 14 year old. Its nothing but circles that he continues to weave so he doesn't have to answer questions, And when he is forced out of his circle all he states is " Thats not a good enough reason, explain it better ".
Anyone who says they can tolerate ACK is either on his little clique, or hasn't been on the net long enough to know the " mod scene "
And lets face it, he has no grounds to be such a superior being... Since most all the work produced to date for his so called mods are far below average.
#68
Posted 13 April 2005 - 12:23 AM
Anyway last time i cheaked when somthing is based on somthing, it does not need to be a clone
#69
Posted 13 April 2005 - 12:55 AM
I came into the BC servers to cheat *once* and that was because they had accused me of cheating before, unjustly and without a shred of evidence that I had done anything wrong. So I showed them what a real cheat was, and then they had the audacity to cry foul. I had played in the servers for about two months and consistently killed over 30 players a game with a K\D ratio of 4.0 without any problem at all... But once you mention that you can't damage anything, you must be cheating... Even though someone on the other team was cheating, and that caused the problem to crop up. Being killed by someone using a standard objects.ddb cheat can make your client screw up with the server, so you're unable to gain credits or damage\repair anything.
As for calling me self-righteous, you know absolutely nothing about me. You assume constantly and believe that your assumptions must be reality.
And stop calling me a "superior being" or whatever else you equate to that FFS... I've never claimed to be superior to anyone and the few times where I do say my work is better than a particular set shown to me is, as previously stated, rare. It's like you make me out to be some kind of bogeyman so you can circulate rumors and make me out to be something horrible.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for hating someone at all, especially with such malevolence. That you could actually be so hostile to someone over the Internet, who you'll never meet or speak to, speaks lots for your own personality. Seek professional mental help or something champ... I wouldn't let my family around someone like you.
#70
Posted 13 April 2005 - 01:11 AM
#71
Posted 13 April 2005 - 01:13 AM
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for hating someone at all, especially with such malevolence. That you could actually be so hostile to someone over the Internet, who you'll never meet or speak to, speaks lots for your own personality. Seek professional mental help or something champ... I wouldn't let my family around someone like you.
LMAO. Oh, the irony! You call people retards and constantly diss their mods, and yet HE needs help.
You're the one with an inferiority complex.
#72
Posted 13 April 2005 - 01:36 AM
Didn't he say he was done with this thread before? *sigh* Just has to get the last word, doesn't he?
I changed my mind when I saw something different that I felt should have been rebutted... Although I notice you have no problems with the multitude of people that spam their so-called hate for me here.
#74
Posted 13 April 2005 - 02:06 AM
#75
Posted 13 April 2005 - 02:20 AM
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#76
Posted 13 April 2005 - 02:24 AM
#77
Posted 13 April 2005 - 02:25 AM
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#78
Posted 13 April 2005 - 02:31 AM
I said I changed my work based on what was written... Never said I wouldn't counter anyone that wrote things I disagreed with. I'm not going to be submissive to anyone, especially when they mask their hostility in the form of a half-ass critique.
#79
Posted 13 April 2005 - 07:57 AM
i'm i the only one who likes his mod?
No, I quite like renalert and will probably download the BF version IF I buy the game (I wouldn't buy ANY game soley for a mod) what I dislike is Aircraftkiller's unwillingness to improve on his not so impressive work. There is a lot of good work there, but there's also a lot of sloppy work such as the Allied barracks, which to be frank looks like a slab of green concrete. Our barracks uses shading and lighting on the texture itself to make the top and sides appear to have the concave shapes between the supports it's not even something that needs to be changed the add to the poly count. And even with this pointed out to him he leaves it as this solid looking green block. That's what I don't like, when he listens and changes things, takes on board what people say he can come out with some impressive stuff. The Tesla Coil is a prime example, but when he hides behind the "this is how it was in red alert" excuse it quite often leaves the structure or tank looking.........lazy.
Our wrongs remain unrectified and our souls won't be exhumed. - Muse - Sing for Absolution
#80
Posted 13 April 2005 - 08:18 AM
ACK your modification is an total conversion of RA1 rite? Yet your using the BattleField engine which last time I check was an FPS which is an completly different genre from RTS.
Total Conversions will often have similiar gameplay, units and storyline these are true to the original.
Since we live in the present we are able to analyse units piece by piece, units have been balanced in ra-gen for instance like the stupidly powerful missile sub and quake tank which were in RA1. The units have extra details cos its an 3D enviroment, certain features behave in an different manner cos of the limitations of the engine. The game is being based upon the sprites and not the dodgy FMV's with brown tanks and some dodgy LST landings on beaches.
ACK giving positive feedback is possible you know, being an "veteran" doesn't mean you have to be an jackass.
Edited by Allied General, 13 April 2005 - 08:21 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users