My stupid theory
#1
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:02 AM
#4
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:29 AM
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
#6
Posted 08 July 2005 - 10:54 AM
ANYTHING can be done in theory. It's putting it into practice that's the problem.
#8
Posted 08 July 2005 - 11:47 AM
Besides its a heck of a lot easier just mailing the thing
Its not like its essential to our survival or anything, or will it help in the current endeavours human kind is trying to undertake, e.g. energy sources and space travelling.
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
#10
Posted 08 July 2005 - 02:18 PM
"To be governed is tragic, to govern is pathetic."
#11
Posted 08 July 2005 - 08:07 PM
This also brings up the question of if this could be applied to humans, would we be the same person or would be become someone different. We wouldn't be the same atoms anymore.
#13
Posted 09 July 2005 - 02:34 PM
"To be governed is tragic, to govern is pathetic."
#15
Posted 10 July 2005 - 05:41 AM
Deep Space Nine and Enterprise were the only good Startreks.
Dude, no. TNG was sweet, if for no other reason than simply because of Q.
#18
Posted 11 July 2005 - 06:31 PM
Deep Space Nine and Enterprise were the only good Startreks.
Dude, no. TNG was sweet, if for no other reason than simply because of Q.
TNG is to steralized, Racially and Conceptually. Everything in TNG was perfectly happy magic fun time, and any little problem that popped up could be easily fixed.
DS9 was far more realistic, With people dealing with moral issues, and war, and all shit.
#19
Posted 11 July 2005 - 06:35 PM
Also Voyager was good i think
#20
Posted 11 July 2005 - 06:39 PM
And how would you reassemble the atom anyway? The data required to put it perfectly back would require an amazing amout of cpu computing power and bandwidth
So in the future, when this power is available, then it would be possible.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users