ACK and friends
#2
Posted 16 July 2005 - 10:53 AM
#3
Posted 16 July 2005 - 11:59 AM
This has got me out of the depressive mood I was just in.
Thanks
#4
Posted 16 July 2005 - 12:01 PM
I laugh at this muchly.
This has got me out of the depressive mood I was just in.
Thanks
Glad i could help, this is the behaviour which i dislike about Prime, hasn't he broken those rules already?
He agitates members and thus causes more deserved retribution
#5
Posted 16 July 2005 - 12:15 PM
#6
Posted 16 July 2005 - 12:28 PM
Prime hasn't broken the rules once, ACK just constantly flames and irriates everyone. Prime might be close to it oneday.
You basically more lenient with Prime cos he is younger right?
#7
Posted 16 July 2005 - 12:33 PM
#8 Guest_ImmoMan_*
Posted 16 July 2005 - 12:45 PM
Edited by ImmoMan, 16 July 2005 - 12:46 PM.
#9
Posted 16 July 2005 - 12:47 PM
#11
Posted 16 July 2005 - 01:10 PM
This guy scares me... An ass who uses punctuation... I didn't think it was possible.
ROFL, well sadly it is possible
#12
Posted 16 July 2005 - 01:10 PM
Personally i think a temporary bann would be far more effective in the sense that he actually discovers he's banned for being an ass and constantly annoying people.
Edited by Andre27, 16 July 2005 - 01:11 PM.
This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Andre 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
- The mathemathical probability of God existing is 67% -
"We are the Borg. Existence as you know it is over. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile."
#13 Guest_ImmoMan_*
Posted 16 July 2005 - 01:14 PM
As soon as he's unbanned he'll just get annoyed for banning His Supreme Highness for no reason at all (except perhaps that we can't handle 'his' truth and are opressing his freedom of speech). And then he'll just flame on as if nothing happened.
If you don't believe that - he has been banned from Revora before. ACK is very slow to take a hint, if he ever takes a hint at all. Let's just say that more comes out of him in a day than goes into him in a lifetime.
Edited by ImmoMan, 16 July 2005 - 01:14 PM.
#14
Posted 16 July 2005 - 01:22 PM
#15
Posted 16 July 2005 - 02:27 PM
#16
Posted 16 July 2005 - 03:02 PM
Go Hybrid! :thumbsup:
#17
Posted 16 July 2005 - 03:58 PM
Funny how in acks book critisism is flaming the creators of something because he doesnt like like 1 bit in it. I laughed when i heard him talking about constructive critisism, back when renalert actually was on the renegade engine (instead of this gfx show hes trying to make from it now) he posted models or something, then the droolies made their posts, then other people not bound to acks ass tried to point something out on the model. Topic locked. And that guy is talking about constructive critisism? Good show for banning him.No its permenant because i think the guys a moron.
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
#18
Posted 16 July 2005 - 05:32 PM
His "constructive criticism" went berzerk with a specific post of his:
Renegade wasn't meant to be C&C95 in first person after the year 2000, so using that as a comparison is a moot point.
The SHP files, besides infantry, were rendered 3D artwork from 3D Studio Max. If "regeneration" would stop making excuses and use the videos, purchase icons AND in-game SHP files as references, they'd actually make their work look like Red Alert and wouldn't it be so laughably stupid.
I made a thread on the admin forum about sending him a warning about that, saying we do not tolerate such wording, as it is in no way constructive. Hostile sent such PM, and got insults as a response.
Insult an authority, and its logical that such authority will get rid of your puny attempt of forum user.
Thing is, the reasons WERE valid. Now whether if he wants to notice that or not, its not our problem, he was correctly banned.
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#20
Posted 16 July 2005 - 05:58 PM
He wasnt banned cause he was arguing, he was banned cause he was insulting others. Isnt it obvious?
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users