Which plane is better? Why?
#2
Posted 13 August 2005 - 04:56 PM
#3
Posted 13 August 2005 - 06:09 PM
which plane is better f-22 or Su-47 Why?
Probably doesn't matter as much as circumstances and pilot skills do.
- SoulReaver
#4
Posted 13 August 2005 - 07:22 PM
Su-47 [S-37] Berkut
Specifications
Country of Origin Russia
Builder Sukhoi
Role
Similar Aircraft
Wingspan: 15.16 m - 16.7 m
Length overall: 22.2 m - 22.6 m
Height overall 6.36 m - 6.40 m
Weight empty, equipped : 24,000 kg (52,910 lb) -- 26000 kg (57,320 lb)
Max T-O weight : 34,000 kg (74,960 lb)
Engines: 2 Perm Aviadvigatel D-30F6 (34,170 lbst), or
2 Saturn/Lyul'ka AL-37FU afterburning 142.2 kN (31,966 lb st) with afterburning
thrust-vectoring in pitch -20o to 20o at 30o per second
Max level speed at height : 2,500km/h (1,350 knots)
Max level speed at S/L : 1,400km/h (756 knots)
Service ceiling : 18,000 m (59,050 ft)
Range with max fuel at height : 1,782 nm (3,300 km/2,050 miles)
Number of hardpoints: 14: 2 wingtip, 6-8 underwing, 6-4 conformal underfuselage
Air-to-air : R-77, R-77PD, R-73, K-74
Air-to-surface: X-29T, X-29L, X-59M, X-31P, X-31A, KAB-500, KAB-1500
Crew: 1
Its all following the stereotypes, the Russian fighter being the rugged and techincally more capable fighter, meanwhile the American one is a safe technologically advanced beast.F-22 Raptor
Projected Employment 15,000 in EMD and 27,000 in production
Propulsion two Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100 engines
Thrust 35,000 lbst
Length 62.08 feet, 18.90 meters
Height 16.67 feet, 5.08 meters
Wingspan 44.5 feet, 13.56 meters
Wing Area 840 square feet
Horizontal Tailspan 29 feet, 8.84 meters
Maximum Takeoff Weight
Ceiling
Speed Mach 1.8 (supercruise: Mach 1.5)
Crew one pilot
Armament Two AIM-9 Sidewinders
six AIM-120C Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM)
one 20mm Gatling gun
two 1,000-pound Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM)
First flight: September 7, 1997
Flight Test Aircraft: Nine
Flight Test Program Length 1997 until 2003 (Approximately 2,700 flights covering roughly 4,800 test hours in EMD)
Date Deployed deliveries beginning in 2002
operational by 2004
Initial Operational Capability Late 2005
Planned Production 339 aircraft between 1998 and 2013
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
#5
Posted 21 August 2005 - 10:10 PM
Not that good question, cause it depends on the pilot's skills, one really good pilot can seek n destroy you with an Yak while you have a BerkutSu-47 [S-37] Berkut
Specifications
Country of Origin Russia
Builder Sukhoi
Role
Similar Aircraft
Wingspan: 15.16 m - 16.7 m
Length overall: 22.2 m - 22.6 m
Height overall 6.36 m - 6.40 m
Weight empty, equipped : 24,000 kg (52,910 lb) -- 26000 kg (57,320 lb)
Max T-O weight : 34,000 kg (74,960 lb)
Engines: 2 Perm Aviadvigatel D-30F6 (34,170 lbst), or
2 Saturn/Lyul'ka AL-37FU afterburning 142.2 kN (31,966 lb st) with afterburning
thrust-vectoring in pitch -20o to 20o at 30o per second
Max level speed at height : 2,500km/h (1,350 knots)
Max level speed at S/L : 1,400km/h (756 knots)
Service ceiling : 18,000 m (59,050 ft)
Range with max fuel at height : 1,782 nm (3,300 km/2,050 miles)
Number of hardpoints: 14: 2 wingtip, 6-8 underwing, 6-4 conformal underfuselage
Air-to-air : R-77, R-77PD, R-73, K-74
Air-to-surface: X-29T, X-29L, X-59M, X-31P, X-31A, KAB-500, KAB-1500
Crew: 1Its all following the stereotypes, the Russian fighter being the rugged and techincally more capable fighter, meanwhile the American one is a safe technologically advanced beast.F-22 Raptor
Projected Employment 15,000 in EMD and 27,000 in production
Propulsion two Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100 engines
Thrust 35,000 lbst
Length 62.08 feet, 18.90 meters
Height 16.67 feet, 5.08 meters
Wingspan 44.5 feet, 13.56 meters
Wing Area 840 square feet
Horizontal Tailspan 29 feet, 8.84 meters
Maximum Takeoff Weight
Ceiling
Speed Mach 1.8 (supercruise: Mach 1.5)
Crew one pilot
Armament Two AIM-9 Sidewinders
six AIM-120C Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM)
one 20mm Gatling gun
two 1,000-pound Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM)
First flight: September 7, 1997
Flight Test Aircraft: Nine
Flight Test Program Length 1997 until 2003 (Approximately 2,700 flights covering roughly 4,800 test hours in EMD)
Date Deployed deliveries beginning in 2002
operational by 2004
Initial Operational Capability Late 2005
Planned Production 339 aircraft between 1998 and 2013
Mod Progress:
Models:----------------------------------------
INI___:----------------------------------------
Link : http://forums.revora...p?showforum=859
#6
Posted 22 August 2005 - 12:31 AM
#7
Posted 22 August 2005 - 08:29 AM
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
#8
Posted 22 August 2005 - 09:57 AM
This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Andre 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
- The mathemathical probability of God existing is 67% -
"We are the Borg. Existence as you know it is over. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile."
#9
Posted 22 August 2005 - 11:17 AM
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
#10
Posted 22 August 2005 - 01:42 PM
Theyre already planning to sell other things to China, they desperately need the cash and the current government has problems in even keeping the research program alive.
lol they get all the funds from iran and in return the iranians get WMDS!!!
#11
Posted 22 August 2005 - 04:34 PM
My money's on the F-22, purely because it's surely more reliable. The S-37's design surely makes it unstable. It'd be worth seeing it in action before such a comparison is accurately made. Personally, I think Namco chose it because it looks awesome
However, the regular Sukhoi planes might have a chance. What's the spec on the Super Flanker, Blodo?
#12
Posted 22 August 2005 - 11:53 PM
I think that Blodo is right ! The Berkut is more capable, based on its stats but its not tested yet !!! Second the F22 is cutting edge equipped plane, that uses the most technologically advanced stuff to engage its enemies and not the incredible capabilities of the plane itself but its avionics, and electronic systems... So i put on both of them !!! I like the Berkut's design but i think that this is not enough (only the design !), it is a very capable plane and for sure i want to see it on action !!! The F-22 is also very good but with its technologicaly advanced systems.... NOW if Brekut had F-22 systems then it would came a SUPER DUPER all purpose fighter !!!Someone plays AC04 too much to ask this question
My money's on the F-22, purely because it's surely more reliable. The S-37's design surely makes it unstable. It'd be worth seeing it in action before such a comparison is accurately made. Personally, I think Namco chose it because it looks awesome
However, the regular Sukhoi planes might have a chance. What's the spec on the Super Flanker, Blodo?
Mod Progress:
Models:----------------------------------------
INI___:----------------------------------------
Link : http://forums.revora...p?showforum=859
#13
Posted 23 August 2005 - 11:01 AM
This one is as capable as the F-22 imho, and its even better in terms of speed according to these specs. I need to find more detail about the F-22 though.Su-37 "Super Flanker"
Specifications
Country of Origin Russia
Builder Sukhoi
Role Multi-role fighter
Similar Aircraft
Wing Span 15.16 m / 49 ft 9 in
Length 21.94 m / 72 ft
Height 6.84 m / 22 ft 5 in
Weight 40,565 lb empty / 74,956 lb max. take off
Engine Two Lyulka AL-37FU vectored-thrust afterburning turbofans, 30,855 lb thrust each
Maximum speed 2,440 km/h / 1,516 mph
Cruising speed
Range 3,500 km / 2,175 miles
Service Ceiling 59,000 ft
Armament One GSh-30-1 30mm cannon, plus up to 18,075 lb including R-73/R-77 AAMs, ASMs, bombs, rockets, drop tanks, and ECM pods carried on fourteen external points
Crew 1
User Countries under development for Russia
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
#14
Posted 23 August 2005 - 11:48 AM
I think that even from the F-22 the EUROFIGHTER is better and much more capable also the JSF is a very good plane, and has more latest technology equipments than of the F22.... Now as for the Superflanker, im not sure for its capabilities !This one is as capable as the F-22 imho, and its even better in terms of speed according to these specs. I need to find more detail about the F-22 though.
Mod Progress:
Models:----------------------------------------
INI___:----------------------------------------
Link : http://forums.revora...p?showforum=859
#15
Posted 23 August 2005 - 03:39 PM
http://www.fighter-p...info/ef2000.htm
F-22
http://www.fighter-p...om/info/f22.htm
JSF
http://www.fighter-p...om/info/jsf.htm
Su-37
http://www.fighter-p...m/info/su37.htm
S-37
http://www.fighter-p...om/info/s37.htm
By this site's reckoning, the speed ranks are:
Berkut
Super-Flanker/Terminator
Typhoon
Raptor
JSF
But this doesn't count for a great deal in a dogfight, does it? If you ask me, the fight's a close-run thing purely because the weapons systems can't be that much different. The western fighters use AMRAAM and such anyway...I wouldn't expect there's *that* much in it.
#16
Posted 23 August 2005 - 05:03 PM
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
#17
Posted 23 August 2005 - 08:20 PM
Yeah i agree, the dogfights don't exist nowadays, also the main dogfight weapon was the vulcan cannon, a weapon that in nowadays is almost never used... except from A-10 that uses a vulcan cannon bigger than normal, and firing depleted uranium shells...Dogfights almost dont exist today, now that America has gone to use the longest range rockets possible on their fighters. Everyone else had to follow at least partially, so now its more of a "pickaboo-push-the-button-first" contest.
Mod Progress:
Models:----------------------------------------
INI___:----------------------------------------
Link : http://forums.revora...p?showforum=859
#18
Posted 23 August 2005 - 08:23 PM
- SoulReaver
#19
Posted 23 August 2005 - 10:07 PM
The F-22 still uses a Vulcan, the A-10 uses a GAU-8.
true cos your buggered if u use all missiles, i thought most planes have guns?
#20
Posted 23 August 2005 - 10:35 PM
ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users