Edited by AlexArt, 09 October 2005 - 11:56 AM.
Real Armament Parameters
#2
Posted 09 October 2005 - 09:56 AM
http://web.etel.ru/~saper/index.html
Hundreds of mines with detailed description (in russian too):
http://web.etel.ru/~...ndex-mines.html
Edited by Creator, 09 October 2005 - 09:58 AM.
#4
Posted 09 October 2005 - 11:58 AM
Who deleted my post !!! Things are going crazy !Everything about mines and sapper work (in russian):
http://web.etel.ru/~saper/index.html
Hundreds of mines with detailed description (in russian too):
http://web.etel.ru/~...ndex-mines.html
Mod Progress:
Models:----------------------------------------
INI___:----------------------------------------
Link : http://forums.revora...p?showforum=859
#6
Posted 16 October 2005 - 04:33 PM
Couple of corrections. The Battlemaster in Generals is the Type 69 and Type 69-II. It's a variant (Not much changed though) of the T-54 which is now domestically manufactured in China. Also, the Crusader is not a light tank but is instead a cancelled artillery piece from the late 1990s. It should have replaced the M109A6 but didn't. I'd recommend using the LAV-AT for that designation, it has a 25mm cannon and two TOW-2 missiles (Enough to take out most MBTs), except it's currently on limited deployment with the USMC.
The US heavy tank would be quite hard to fill, so I'd recommend a powerful M1A2 with good FCS over a heavy tank that doesn't yet exist.
Edited by MSpencer, 16 October 2005 - 04:40 PM.
#7
Posted 17 October 2005 - 12:03 PM
Have you worked with both US and Russian mines? For how many years you were sapper in army? In what wars did you know that Russian mines are less well made?Russian mines have always been quite effective and cheap, but have suffered from reliability problems. Whereas US devices are guaranteed to go off most of the time, Russian devices are significantly cheaper and as a result, less well made.
AlexArt,
Габариты брони:
http://gspo.ru/index...?showtopic=1489
Семейство FCS (включая FMBT)
http://gspo.ru/index.php?showtopic=566
http://btvt.narod.ru/3/fmbt.htm
#9
Posted 26 October 2005 - 08:42 PM
BMP4 RF
T90 RF
Black Eagle RF
M1A2 Abrams USA
Crusader USA
T98 PRoC
Battlemaster PRoC
Please give me links and suggest everything you want to be realized
Should I remake Paladin into a howitzer?
#10
Posted 17 November 2005 - 12:16 PM
T90 RF - 125mm
Black Eagle RF - I assume it will be a 125mm, since that's what most modern Russian tank cannons are.
M1A2 Abrams USA - 120mm M256 cannon
Crusader USA - 155mm if you're talking about the artillery
T98 PRoC - 125mm cannon
Type 69 PRoC - 100mm smoothbore, rifled on the -II
#11
Posted 17 November 2005 - 01:56 PM
http://armor.kiev.ua/fofanov/Hey does anyone know anything about what real weapons sholud have the following vehicles:
BMP4 RF
T90 RF
Black Eagle RF
M1A2 Abrams USA
Crusader USA
T98 PRoC
Battlemaster PRoC
Please give me links and suggest everything you want to be realized
Should I remake Paladin into a howitzer?
http://www.alexfiles99.narod.ru/
Несмотря на весьма скептические оценки Фофанова оценки брони Черного орла переваливают далеко за 1000мм (у амов 770мм). Кстати, резко уменьшай ускорение амерских танков. На ускорение влияет крутящий момент двигателя (torque). Чем он больше, тем лучше. У амеров он 538Нм, у нас переваливает за 3000.
Edited by Creator, 17 November 2005 - 02:02 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users