Conspiracy Discussion
#1
Posted 24 January 2006 - 07:54 PM
So lets begin. The Moon landing, does anyone believe we Americans landed on the Moon in 1969?
This is a yes no answer but give a good reason why you think so or why you think not.
#2
Posted 24 January 2006 - 07:58 PM
- SoulReaver
#3
Posted 24 January 2006 - 08:31 PM
Besides, did anyone notice how perfect that camera angle was for the first landing? The camera appeared to be perfectly in place before the first man stepped out and said the famous line. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it just seemed too perfect.
Edited by crave22, 26 January 2006 - 02:59 AM.
#4
Posted 24 January 2006 - 09:52 PM
I guess I accept it as a fact. But it's hard when you have that niggling doubt that really all the US and Russia were doing is proving who had the best intercontinental nuclear missile technology by fighting to get a 'missile' to the fastest moving target around the planet... the moon.
#6
Posted 25 January 2006 - 05:37 PM
- SoulReaver
#7
Posted 25 January 2006 - 08:33 PM
#8
Posted 25 January 2006 - 11:54 PM
#9
Posted 25 January 2006 - 11:55 PM
My mom knew someone who was working on the lunar landing project. Trust me, it was real.
Camera could have been something else they dropped in on their way down to give the media something. Or maybe it was on the military ship the government never told anyone about... Or they just lied about who took the first step on the moon. Or Neil is actually the dude behind the camere, who's to say who's talking with those big sun visors down where you can't see their faces?
#10
Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:03 AM
#11
Posted 26 January 2006 - 03:00 AM
#12
Posted 26 January 2006 - 08:18 AM
UFOs(space ship from another world), yes it has come to this. This topic is always has its dark backaround, so are they real or is the gov't testing new weapons that we seem to catch on camera. If they are real why is it they only appear in certain areas of the world(Heck I never saw one and we have alot of clear nights) but if they are not real then why do people report about it claming they did see a UFO. So same again if they are real give a reason but if not still give a reason.
#14
Posted 26 January 2006 - 10:54 AM
Job Openings with the Guild: Division Staff, News Posters.
Job Openings with Ares: Documentation Maintainer, Active Testers.
PM if interested.
#15
Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:32 PM
#16
Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:32 PM
World Domination Status: ▾2.7%
#17
Posted 26 January 2006 - 03:22 PM
EDIT: But then again I haven't finished reading this book on it yet, so I don't know the full story behind it. Also, they haven't got a reliable and working system to produce energy from it yet. All their attempts at power production have failed as yet from it, with the minor exceptions of some small unmanned aircraft (UFOs). This has been going on since WW2, which explains the Roswell crash, it was a test flight of a ZP craft, but it went wrong and the craft crashed, that's why the FBI got all of it away so quickly before most people found out about it.
EDIT2: If anyone here's ever watched Stargate Atlantis, you'd have a better idea of what I'm taking about, the ZPMs in it, they use the same type of principle as what I'm saying
Edited by Nighthawk200, 26 January 2006 - 03:29 PM.
Job Openings with the Guild: Division Staff, News Posters.
Job Openings with Ares: Documentation Maintainer, Active Testers.
PM if interested.
#18
Posted 26 January 2006 - 04:15 PM
It is known that such a theoretical particle operates the same way as magnetism and electromagnetic forces do.
This would not only invole creating an artificial dense mass that creates enough gravitons to do such a thing but then you'd have to have it creat anti-gravitons so it repels and does not not attract. We haven't even conquered anti-matter and it's been created decades ago.
How much artificail-density mass would it take to repel the gravity of the earth? A crazy amount... We still use chemical fuel engines to get out of the atmosphere.
Does a dense antimatter mass create anti-gravitons? Until you can create enough to create an once to measure it from, how can you tell. We can keep antimatter alive for nano-seconds till it merges and destroyes itself.
We are 100's years away from ZG tech...
Save the environment, use green text
Some Bullshit Somewhere
#19
Posted 26 January 2006 - 04:32 PM
- SoulReaver
#20
Posted 26 January 2006 - 05:14 PM
As Spencer said, if the USA did get that energy, they wouldn't keep it to themselves. They'd advertise the fact they had it and supply it to the populace, effectively ruling the world by virtue that the rest of it eats out of their hand.
Back to UFOs, there is no doubt in my mind that extraterrestrial beings exist, nor that among them there is sure to be a form of life as advanced as, or more advanced than, humankind.
Their being hampered and bound by the same rules of space-time as us would lead me to conjecture that there's no way on God's Earth they'd be able to contact us for the same reason we can't contact them. We simply can't get the message out far enough, nor send an envoy. If it takes light four years from the nearest star (Alpha Centauri) to Earth, think what it would take any organism in a spaceship travelling at sub-light speed.
It'd take centuries just to pop next door, let alone to a far-reaching arm of the galaxy in the hope of finding a foreign civilisation. Short of making a spacefaring city which drifts endlessly (and is frought with dangers such as other celestial bodies, revolt and revolution, disease, the inevitable famine, etc), there's no hope of doing it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users