marshal...makes me mad...he abandoned his retaliation mod.
marshal.cannis.net
Edited by Black Rose, 28 September 2007 - 01:30 PM.
Posted 28 September 2007 - 01:30 PM
Edited by Black Rose, 28 September 2007 - 01:30 PM.
Posted 21 November 2007 - 02:47 AM
Posted 21 November 2007 - 08:30 AM
Yuri - Railguns, Stealth, Subterreanean (underground), Biowarfare and Mindcontrol technology.
Posted 21 November 2007 - 05:15 PM
They have that - the Laser Cannon and Hover Prism Tank.maybe laser beam tech(similar to prism)
Radiation to me is more of a Soviet thing, but the F.F. are more Allies-based.something like gamma radiation(just blue radiation, maybe does something else cool)
They have the Hover Prism Tank.you could give them hover tech(come on Future forces)
They will have stealth technology in the next beta version. One of my initial plans was to have the player choose between Chrono and Stealth technology after building a Battle Lab, hence why the original name of the Advanced Lab was 'Chrono Lab'. I'm bringing that back, since I now have applicable minor super weapons for both techs.and phase tech? (not invisible,but phased, so it cant be hit as easy or something, or maybe if you take away stealth from yuri...)
Posted 23 November 2007 - 01:37 AM
Posted 24 November 2007 - 12:50 AM
Posted 24 November 2007 - 09:58 AM
I know the similarities can be a bit annoying, but it's part of the story as to why they're similar.one thing i think would make the mod better, is make the future forces more different
right now they are so similar to the allies, its not funny
The Stealth Lab (in the next version) is a recoloured GDI Tech Centre. Also, I don't like to overuse TS stuff, otherwise it's just TS.maybe you could use some tib sun graphics(for tanks and stuff) and even for some buildings, and change their colour, cause the blue is already really taken by allies, maybe they could be green, or yellow
It already is that way. Future Forces is a nickname given to them by the Allies. They have their own name, they'll use it in the campaign. If you look on the Future Forces page on the site, you'll see the name was coined by the Allies, and that they don't know what they're actually called.and maybe give them a different name then 'future forces' like that could be a nickname given to them by the other teams, but their real name is 'the league of -something-(and no, not extraordinary gentlemen)
Posted 25 November 2007 - 09:42 AM
Also, I don't like to overuse TS stuff, otherwise it's just TS.
It already is that way. Future Forces is a nickname given to them by the Allies. They have their own name, they'll use it in the campaign. If you look on the Future Forces page on the site, you'll see the name was coined by the Allies, and that they don't know what they're actually called.
I know the similarities can be a bit annoying, but it's part of the story as to why they're similar.
Posted 25 November 2007 - 10:26 AM
Posted 30 November 2007 - 07:06 PM
Edited by Black Rose, 30 November 2007 - 07:08 PM.
Posted 01 April 2008 - 07:34 PM
Posted 01 April 2008 - 07:37 PM
I have one question to the end: didnt u think about changing German AT Cannon model? It looks like highter pilbox, so what about something like Guardian tower from CnC3? It will be good.I am not registered, ut I am interested about this mod, its 1st YR mod that I ever see (really) and I sometimes have ideas for many games, but mostly of them was rejected, so I will have some ideas for u:
Posted 01 April 2008 - 08:22 PM
I have considered this, but will not be including it in this mod. It's rather niggly to work with, as true working mine logic would need mutator weapons and similar things. Mines will make an appearance as props in a campaign mission, but no mine layers.1) What about minelayer or sapper, that will place mines? This will have only Germany for their defensive-tactic
The Apocalypse is double-barreled, is it not?2) Any kind of double-barreled tank for Soviets, probably Russia.
I think two radiation-type things are enough. I don't want to go completely overboard.3) If Iraqi has Rad Tower, what about Rad Tank?
One of the campaign infantry units is armed with a laser. I'm not that fond of having lasers on a lot of things.4) I didnt find it, so what about infantry with laser?
Although Gauss cannons are a good idea, they're rather hard to represent in game. The laser logic would produce the graphically closest result, but then it's just a laser. And railguns are just lasers with particle effects and damage in line-of-sight anyway (well, to the game's logic, anyway).5) For FF weapon Gauss cannon, its similar like Railgun, and with FF's technology from future they can garnte that snout of tank/structure dont melt.
I don't get what you're saying about B-52s, I don't have any B-52s. Both the Airstrike and MOAB use B-2 Bombers. The only difference is that an Airstrike calls in 7 with small, medium-strength payloads; then the MOAB calls in one with a MOAB payload.6) For USA, if I understand it right that when u build Airstrike Uplink, u must research technology for MOAB? I have idea when u build Airstrike Uplink, u will have B-52 Bombardment ability and u will must research MOAB Bombardment, that will upgrade B-52 to B-2.
Play as the Future Forces. Build the Ion Cannon Uplink . Though it's no longer like the TS GDI one, and is more similar to the C&C3 one in damage style.Is there something like GDI Ion Cannon?
America - Air Support (Paratroopers, Airstrikes)And can i ask which specializations have each nation?
I don't make a lot of the graphics in the mod. Besides, the current model fits in with the Allied style, and I thought the Guardian Cannon was rather smaller looking.I have one question to the end: didnt u think about changing German AT Cannon model?
Posted 02 April 2008 - 04:24 AM
yes u didI hope I've helped answer your questions.
Posted 07 May 2008 - 03:52 PM
Edited by Aquila Noctis, 07 May 2008 - 05:58 PM.
Posted 11 May 2008 - 08:46 AM
Posted 11 May 2008 - 10:20 PM
Do not send me "how do i make my own mod" type PMs. I've had enough of them. I will just ignore them from now on. Read tutorials and use Google. It worked for the rest of us.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users