Words and warnings seem to have little/no effect therefor i suggest this stronger measure.
Can someone from the staff/admins set this up?
Edit: Corrected grammar.
Edited by Andre27, 25 May 2006 - 08:40 PM.
Posted 25 May 2006 - 08:39 PM
Edited by Andre27, 25 May 2006 - 08:40 PM.
This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Andre 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
Posted 25 May 2006 - 10:15 PM
Posted 26 May 2006 - 09:08 AM
Edited by milbot, 26 May 2006 - 09:09 AM.
Posted 26 May 2006 - 09:25 AM
Posted 26 May 2006 - 10:45 AM
Posted 26 May 2006 - 02:00 PM
Posted 26 May 2006 - 02:06 PM
Posted 26 May 2006 - 09:02 PM
Posted 27 May 2006 - 01:22 AM
World Domination Status: ▾2.7%
Posted 27 May 2006 - 09:07 AM
Posted 27 May 2006 - 02:57 PM
Posted 27 May 2006 - 04:04 PM
Posted 27 May 2006 - 05:28 PM
Edited by Beowulf, 27 May 2006 - 05:29 PM.
NZ.org | BBPCG
Discord: The Astronomer#1314
Steam
Posted 27 May 2006 - 06:05 PM
Posted 27 May 2006 - 07:39 PM
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:06 PM
Hello Universal,
I've been receiving a lot of complaints about your posts on Team Revenge forums (specially D-Day). I understand that you have a lot of interest on Mig's mod, specially because it simulates World War II with some fantastic voxels and graphic quality and that you think that Mig is somewhat not enough informed, because you apparently have access to military classified data. Seeing your warnings (67%), you are close to be suspended if you continue this kind of post.
People linked some posts were you apparently behaved bad. To be honest with you, only one link annoyed me: HERE. That technically qualifies as flames, since Mig Eater was hurt, annoyed by your posts. Other posts were simply annoyances where you didn't read one of their basic rules: never discuss about a single unit in a single topic.
Trying to help people is nowhere considered to be a crime or against forum rules, but it's always important to measure your words and actions before posting. What is your objective when posting? Do you think that lowering him to a military ignorant will challenge him to be better or will make him respect you? Do you think that saying that you have access to military classified data instantaneously makes you the God of military knowledge? Don't you think that covering your arguments with links or facts from reliable sources would make people recognize more your knowledge and research about this subject, instead of lowering others? Even if the data is classified, most of the logic that can proove it is available to public.
And also, if you want to be properly respected and your posts properly understood, couldn't you read posts from others as well? You have to be the example, so you can get a better treatement from others.
I know you can be a much better person than that and I know humans can learn and adapt themselves to a new situation. Consider it a warning and, please, don't force me to make all your posts under moderation aproval. I hate doing this kind of thing, but that will happen if you continue to act in this way, on D-day forums.
Regards,
~ Banshee
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users