A question
Started by Natus, Jun 12 2004 11:26 AM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 12 June 2004 - 11:26 AM
My ZH lags like crazy, will you guys include a optio n to lower the number of particles used? Dumb question, yeah, but I really want to play and not lag so much it take a Mig five minutes to move across the screen if theres a firefight below em.
Natus 3.4
Corrupt program now requires constant reboots and does not function at all in majority of instances. Designed with a web browser component to replace AOL, it has exceeded our expectations by being more crashy and unreliable and with worse tech support. We didn't think it was physically possible! A general product recall is advised; when it does function it seems to require background processes Girl 0.1Beta to stave off further crashes. Will someone PLEASE remove that code, and insert Backbone 1.9 in its place? That's assuming we even bother to continue this prog.
Corrupt program now requires constant reboots and does not function at all in majority of instances. Designed with a web browser component to replace AOL, it has exceeded our expectations by being more crashy and unreliable and with worse tech support. We didn't think it was physically possible! A general product recall is advised; when it does function it seems to require background processes Girl 0.1Beta to stave off further crashes. Will someone PLEASE remove that code, and insert Backbone 1.9 in its place? That's assuming we even bother to continue this prog.
#2
Posted 12 June 2004 - 02:00 PM
wow....I can have 10 nukes go off at the same time and not notice one bit of a slow down
anyway go to your options in Generals and set the detail or whatever to lowest that should make the game run faster (though it wont look as good)
anyway go to your options in Generals and set the detail or whatever to lowest that should make the game run faster (though it wont look as good)
#3
Posted 12 June 2004 - 07:55 PM
I tried that, even disabled shaders. :(
Natus 3.4
Corrupt program now requires constant reboots and does not function at all in majority of instances. Designed with a web browser component to replace AOL, it has exceeded our expectations by being more crashy and unreliable and with worse tech support. We didn't think it was physically possible! A general product recall is advised; when it does function it seems to require background processes Girl 0.1Beta to stave off further crashes. Will someone PLEASE remove that code, and insert Backbone 1.9 in its place? That's assuming we even bother to continue this prog.
Corrupt program now requires constant reboots and does not function at all in majority of instances. Designed with a web browser component to replace AOL, it has exceeded our expectations by being more crashy and unreliable and with worse tech support. We didn't think it was physically possible! A general product recall is advised; when it does function it seems to require background processes Girl 0.1Beta to stave off further crashes. Will someone PLEASE remove that code, and insert Backbone 1.9 in its place? That's assuming we even bother to continue this prog.
#4
Posted 13 June 2004 - 01:24 AM
wow what is your system specs?
#5
Posted 13 June 2004 - 07:50 PM
Home XP
Intel Pentium 4
1.91 Ghz
256 mb ram
Advent computer
Nvidia Gforce
Intel Pentium 4
1.91 Ghz
256 mb ram
Advent computer
Nvidia Gforce
Natus 3.4
Corrupt program now requires constant reboots and does not function at all in majority of instances. Designed with a web browser component to replace AOL, it has exceeded our expectations by being more crashy and unreliable and with worse tech support. We didn't think it was physically possible! A general product recall is advised; when it does function it seems to require background processes Girl 0.1Beta to stave off further crashes. Will someone PLEASE remove that code, and insert Backbone 1.9 in its place? That's assuming we even bother to continue this prog.
Corrupt program now requires constant reboots and does not function at all in majority of instances. Designed with a web browser component to replace AOL, it has exceeded our expectations by being more crashy and unreliable and with worse tech support. We didn't think it was physically possible! A general product recall is advised; when it does function it seems to require background processes Girl 0.1Beta to stave off further crashes. Will someone PLEASE remove that code, and insert Backbone 1.9 in its place? That's assuming we even bother to continue this prog.
#6
Posted 14 June 2004 - 02:53 PM
nlln i have an althlon 1.2 512 ddr 128 radon 9000 and i have all my settings on full the only time it slows down is if there is a large group of cpu controled units moving to attack or when i set off 75 nukes on one base but that dosent matter mutch cos the game ends soon after that nlln
#7
Posted 14 June 2004 - 03:26 PM
dont you have anything better to do when you play than build 75 nukes :w00t0: :wako:
#8
Posted 17 June 2004 - 10:07 AM
nlln yeah but i got tierd of bulding a large army only to find it wasent large enougth so i tryed a diffrent tatic and went for lots of defence and nukes u should have a go it is hard trying to manage ur power walst rebulding defences when u r being continulisley attacked and finding buld space fore thenm and trying to get money it also takes a long time nlln
#9
Posted 17 June 2004 - 10:55 AM
i think my comp would have a hard time to play a game with 75 nukes it would have an gigantic lag
#10 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 18 June 2004 - 12:41 PM
Here's a plan for defense, although my strategy leaves little space for moving in and out of the base. Bunkers filled with Tank Hunters are your best friends.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users