very interesting, i like it. keep it up. constructive criticism.... you seem to over simplify. thats ok cause you have to get your point across quick. elaborate more in the future. my disagreements(cause the're more interesting than agreements).....the u.s. is not in turmoil...the world is. pre-emptive agression is not its goal, its not about oil/ww3/emporer bush/or any other free mason/secret society/world domineering notion a person can come up with. its about 9/11. period! it simply cant happen again. this is where europe should stratiglicly ally itself w/ the u.s. this would make a global "DIPLOMATIC" response much more effective, as apposed to u.s." lone wolf" agression.
i say this with the most future human regret as possible. until europe has its own (possibly multiple) 9/11
it will stand on the sidelines, attempting nuetrallity, doing nothing ,not wanting to fuel the fire, hoping it will go away,until it directly effects them, again, only in a much,much bigger way.ww3 wont start tomorrow, because it started years ago,its untimely, its unfortunate, its UNCONVENTIONAL, and will, no doubt be unrelenting, unending and unwise.
in 2 more years bush will be gone for good(not supreme chancelor). i saw "v for vendetta" too, awsome movie... but still fiction. really awsome movie!!!!!! but as for today, still fiction.
any quick fix (druvianism or otherwise) would be WORLD APPRECIATED.
peace and love,
NARCISMO 316
Edited by narcismo316, 05 August 2006 - 04:44 AM.