The good in religion
#1
Posted 01 September 2006 - 04:54 PM
Here's a starter: It taught the masses that discrimination agianst colour was wrong(all major religions teach this)
Now post!
#2
Posted 01 September 2006 - 05:07 PM
Religion also kept people back, which is why there was no development for centuries thanks to the Church.
So its pretty much of a two way thing. Religion was made back then to keep order, but when change was needed, Science was refused to keep the order. Now with this change in our century with Science and whatnot, Religion is being refused because now we have things in place to now keep the order, and also it is becoming disproved.
I believe in God myself personally, but I also believe in Science also. Every part of a Human works as it should from the capillaries to the Brain, same as the universe. It leads me to believe that something like this must have started from somewhere in my opinion. Of course you could say alternatively that after millions of years of Evolution created the perfect animal (us), which I also believe and that nature (cosmic and planet) adapts itself to every situation.
Edited by Elerium, 01 September 2006 - 05:15 PM.
#4
Posted 01 September 2006 - 05:18 PM
Seems a bit elitist to call yourself perfect. Humans killing each other, is that perfect? Power is not perfection. Overpopulation is not perfection. And calling yourself perfect CERTAINLY isn't perfection.
You misjudge what I say. I meant to say the Human is the perfect result so far of nature. I.e. self thinking, free will unlike the animals, able to uncover the mysteries of the universe. I mean this in anatomical terms, not mental terms. Although you could say that all this was part of a mutation, but in some cases mutations can be beneficial.
Edited by Elerium, 01 September 2006 - 05:21 PM.
#5
Posted 01 September 2006 - 06:14 PM
#6
Posted 01 September 2006 - 06:27 PM
As far as religion doing something good for me, well, let's start with the discrimination thing. Can't forget what started a good chunk of slavery, the exploitation of Africa, which was due to imperialism, and religious zeal for conversion and "Christianization". I suppose you can say it said in some cases that discrimination was wrong, but so did a ton of notable figures completely unconnected with the church throughout history.
And we have to remember, that before religion, we weren't headbashing barbarians. While it is true that the western countries developed around religion, you should not forget that the primarily atheist China developed an empire as powerful and vast as the Roman Empire (Who they actually made contact with at one point, according to an archaelogical dig which has found Roman shields in Asia) without resorting to any form of organized religion. I believe it may be deduced that the development of complex societies and morality is mostly due to the manifestation of human instinct in a complex group with language, customs, and culture, all gradual things which built up through the diversification of various ethnic groups.
Positive things for me? Well, I suppose a positive thing would be the fact that I've attended a bunch of funerals put on by churches. I suppose it may be said that after the various religions dragged Europe through the Dark Ages, they did help to provide incentive in the form of squandered money from corrupt nobles and clergy, and from the Muslims they killed in the Middle East, to rebuild Europe and European culture, but as much can be said for the patrons of the arts, mostly noblemen who tended to be Italian and French. Then the Church almost erased all of that with it's six or seven schisms which it wouldn't give up on.
I suppose another good thing would be the presence of a church instead of a convenience store or an office building a little away from where I live. I do prefer a nice white building as opposed to some glass and steel monstrosity.
#7
Posted 02 September 2006 - 02:17 AM
Here's a starter: It taught the masses that discrimination agianst colour was wrong(all major religions teach this)
Although it teaches this now, religion was in the past (and even in some cases nowadays), as Spence said, a major cause of discrimination, and I don't think this a very good example.
However, religion has taught us not to screw our neighbours wives, which I guess can be a good thing (depending on who you are )
#8
Posted 02 September 2006 - 08:05 AM
In my opinion religion brought, in the olden days, explanations for things people couldn't explain. It gave and gives people something to hold on to, especially in dark times.
#9
Posted 02 September 2006 - 08:08 AM
AND that first point of yours was also right. I'm an athiest and I hold no real bias. I know Christians... with no real bias.
In the end, it's the Bible, God, and Jesus (Or Buddha, or Allah and the QUaran, or what/whoever) VS. Modern science, the big bang, and research. And all debates will either become:
A. An AUTOMATIC tie, as the religious faction will not be converted.
B. Scientific victory.
The moral of that story is do drugs?
#10
Posted 02 September 2006 - 02:10 PM
Blaat, rape is wrong. Discrimination is wrong.If you got them all five right in the head, you don't need someone else to tell you that rape and discrimination are wrong.
In my opinion religion brought, in the olden days, explanations for things people couldn't explain. It gave and gives people something to hold on to, especially in dark times.
And on the point of modern science vs. religion, I believe the up and coming generation will possibly be the last well educated bunch we have. If this intelligent design thing wins out, the future of biology will practically collapse, with ill-educated, ill-trained individuals, and a lack, but still a presence, of people who were educated under the current system. This of course will leak into other fields, causing illogical second-guessing and the like, and slowing down the progress of science in general by a definitely evident rate.
So science has already lost the argument.
#11
Posted 02 September 2006 - 02:43 PM
"I give you private information on corporations for free and I'm a villain. Mark Zuckerberg gives your private information to corporations for money and he's 'Man of the Year.'" - Assange
#12
Posted 02 September 2006 - 10:45 PM
Techonlogy can be both good and bad, just like religion. They are not counters to each other but they can be. So what is your point? Good religion stops bad techonlogy. Bad Religion stops good technology.
#13
Posted 02 September 2006 - 11:03 PM
And what religion-driven technology could ever save the world? The electronic pocket bible?
#14
Posted 04 September 2006 - 12:18 AM
Economic Left/Right: 6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.64
"Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility." -Sigmund Freud
"Laws: We know what they are, and what they are worth! They are spider webs for the rich and mighty, steel chains for the poor and weak, fishing nets in the hands of the government." -Pierre Joseph Proudhon
"You sleep safe in your beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do you harm." -George Orwell
#15
Posted 06 September 2006 - 04:12 AM
And I have actually have an electronic pocket bible, gotta love technology!
World Domination Status: ▾2.7%
#16
Posted 06 September 2006 - 07:40 AM
#17
Posted 06 September 2006 - 12:46 PM
#18
Posted 06 September 2006 - 02:22 PM
"I give you private information on corporations for free and I'm a villain. Mark Zuckerberg gives your private information to corporations for money and he's 'Man of the Year.'" - Assange
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users