Jump to content


Photo

North Korea and Nuclear Weapons


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Sydr0

Sydr0

    title available

  • New Members
  • 325 posts
  • Location:Serbia & Montenegro

Posted 13 March 2003 - 06:07 PM

What do you guys think is the deal with North Korea? Iraq has no "weapons of massdestruction" yet US is puting alot of pressure on them while North Korea is building Nuclear Weapons and US is totally igrnoring them. What do you guys think is the deal with US and what do you think US is trying to do here.

#2 Deathblow Luc

Deathblow Luc

    Unique

  • Undead
  • 3,768 posts
  • Location:Argentina
  • Division:Ex - Network Leader

Posted 14 March 2003 - 06:53 AM

I dont know if war is a true solution in this case. There are at least 10 ountries that may also sell mass destruction weapons, but it doesnt sound logical to go to war with all of them.

Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


#3 Tom

Tom

    title available

  • Undead
  • 8,475 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Projects:Life
  •  Co-Founder of Revora

Posted 14 March 2003 - 01:16 PM

Well they should have got rid of Saddam last time. America has caused a lot of the problems in this world. American Leaders that is.

#4 Deathblow Luc

Deathblow Luc

    Unique

  • Undead
  • 3,768 posts
  • Location:Argentina
  • Division:Ex - Network Leader

Posted 14 March 2003 - 02:23 PM

I dont doubt they colaborated on creating many. But i actually would like to know why they didnt get rid of Saddam. And also, if they take into account Saddams Kurd massacre, why are they allied to Turkey, if turkish have also massacred Kurds...its simply too messy, and its simply too obvious theres something in the background. One of their excuses for war in Iraq is inmediately contradicted by their actions.

Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


#5 Tom

Tom

    title available

  • Undead
  • 8,475 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Projects:Life
  •  Co-Founder of Revora

Posted 14 March 2003 - 02:42 PM

True but if they had removed him before then they wouldn't have this problem at this moment. Like if the Americans didn't train Bin Laden to attack Russia in the Cold War then the September 11th attack probably wouldn't have happened.

I mean its ridiculous last time they supported Saddam until something like 2 weeks before the Gulf War.

#6 Deathblow Luc

Deathblow Luc

    Unique

  • Undead
  • 3,768 posts
  • Location:Argentina
  • Division:Ex - Network Leader

Posted 14 March 2003 - 03:25 PM

Yeah, but also, they didnt count with Saddam invading (or...well, im doubting that now...)

I dont think that the Sept 11 wouldnt have happened if USA didnt train Bin Laden. Id rather say, that if USA didnt cause so much deaths in the muslim world in the last 100 years, Sept 11 wouldnt have happened. And its logical, neither Hussein or Bin Laden are Gods or prophets, they are names. As every em...terrorist? I dont like the term. Probably if you go to Iran, and ask what they think of American soldiers theyll they are terrorists.

What we are up to, i a global conflict with both incorrect positions. This is: A country who will try to have revenge by war (although its somewhat clear theyd prefer not to be in war) and A country who wants to control worldwide economy even more. Its a fanatism vs ambition war. No good side.

Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


#7 Sydr0

Sydr0

    title available

  • New Members
  • 325 posts
  • Location:Serbia &amp; Montenegro

Posted 15 March 2003 - 02:28 AM

I agree with argcmdr,

and as for the "weapons of mass destruction" I think we all agree that Saddam might have chemical/biological weapons which USA did give him but think about it. USA looks really bad now I mean they claim Saddam has these weapons of mass destruction but really they have NO PROOF. Whats the thing in that. And weapons inspectors cannot find any weapons of mass destruction.

that's the thing USA is claiming something which is probably true but they have NO PROOF. They say they have intelligence and proof but why dont they share it with the inspectors? I really doubt they have any.

Thats like saying must having a reason for attacking but you really cannot say why you're attacking you're just attacking.

#8 Rygar

Rygar

    title available

  • Hosted
  • 1,089 posts
  • Location:Italy

Posted 25 March 2003 - 06:46 PM

Let's make a small synthesis; violation of Kyoto treaty, hacking EU communications, blind support to multicorporations, embargo in Cuba, project of Space shield, total responsability on Columbia tragedy, failure war in Afghanistan, no care about North Korea, project to drill Alaska and the list is still long....

#9 Tom

Tom

    title available

  • Undead
  • 8,475 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Projects:Life
  •  Co-Founder of Revora

Posted 25 March 2003 - 07:16 PM

Well they should have got rid of Saddam last time. America has caused most of the problems in this world. American Leaders that is.


Such as? Specific examples man, specific examples.


Last gulf war. If they did so then there might not be this problem now. But knowing US presidents they would have probably stuck someone else just as bad in.

#10 BobingAbout

BobingAbout

    Serious Modder

  • Hosted
  • 1,288 posts
  • Location:Here
  • Projects:R:ROTC, Destructivality, Factorio Mods
  •  Coder

Posted 19 April 2003 - 01:54 AM

exactly, if they got rid of him last time, they wouldn't be at war now, well, if there wasn't the sept 11th incident they probably wouldn't be pissed enough to be at war now, that started it IMO, but then i missed a lot of news between finding out it was binladin, and finding out they was going on about saddam.
Posted Image
Posted Image

#11 Deathblow Luc

Deathblow Luc

    Unique

  • Undead
  • 3,768 posts
  • Location:Argentina
  • Division:Ex - Network Leader

Posted 19 April 2003 - 08:47 AM

And now theyll end up going against Assad, either militarly or economically. Pay attention at how a "terrorist strike" of doubtful reasons and origin starts a chain of wars and sanctions that only benefit a reduced group. **Breaking news, Bush just gave reconstruction rights to one of the closest construction companies to the White House! :roll: **

Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


#12 Rygar

Rygar

    title available

  • Hosted
  • 1,089 posts
  • Location:Italy

Posted 20 April 2003 - 09:05 AM

A thing that makes me really disappointed is about the recent US bombardament in Iranian lands... My prediction was true, not only Syria, but also Iran is the mext target....

#13 Ash

Ash

    Foxtrot Oscar.

  • Undead
  • 15,526 posts
  • Location:England
  • Projects:Robot Storm
  •  Keep calm and carry on.

Posted 20 April 2003 - 10:13 AM

"American Empire". The more I say it, the more the words have a ring to them... ¬_¬




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users