30 replies to this topic

[Comrade Kal]

http://www.indymedia.../06/343736.html

http://www.indymedia.../10/353373.html

http://www.indymedia.../10/353458.html


But on the plus side:

Anarchists are threatening to storm the Palace of Westminster in a potentially violent anti-war demonstration.

http://www.mailonsun...in_page_id=1770

Oh, if only that weren't such an oversimplification. I see the anti-war protestors have been upgraded from 'left-wing extremists' to 'anarchists' then. Still, good to see the police managed to beat the shit out of everyone, ever, again.

http://www.indymedia.../10/352912.html

[chemical ali]

And your little lefty-anarcho-commie-socialist point is?

[Airman]

Since that's across the world, I say:

Shoot them anarcist commies!

[MSpencer]

That should fix everything. Of course. Let's just shoot Kal, Immo, and all the other socialists from Europe. In fact, why don't we dig up Karl Marx, Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Leibknecht, Vladimir Lenin, and a couple dead English socialists and shoot their corpses. Then, we'll all go and exploit the working class.

[chemical ali]

That should fix everything. Of course. Let's just shoot Kal, Immo, and all the other socialists from Europe. In fact, why don't we dig up Karl Marx, Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Leibknecht, Vladimir Lenin, and a couple dead English socialists and shoot their corpses. Then, we'll all go and exploit the working class.

See you have your familys blood of the Spencer classical liberal bloodline!

[Airman]

I'm a repubican. I belive in keeping our countries safe.

[Cossack]

Sure the republicans are harder on terrorists than the democrats....but that won't stop terrorism, and in fact makes it worse. If they go around arresting and torturing people without a fair trial, and continue invading and bombing countries, you know what it does? It kills a small percentage of terrorists, and makes the other 90% hate you guys even more.

[Comrade Kal]

So to clarify, Ali and Razgriz, you believe it should be a crime to carry magazines with anti-war articles in them?

And that we should only jail terrorists if they are muslims?

[chemical ali]

So to clarify, Ali and Razgriz, you believe it should be a crime to carry magazines with anti-war articles in them?

And that we should only jail terrorists if they are muslims?

If your anarchists why don't you actually do something like take over, all religion is evil and should be banned with the current situation at the moment I hope the UK has a civil war, I will be on the Royalist side for sure.

[duke_Qa]

royalists, you would probably mean loyalists. nothing is royal about the royal families anymore. a civil war in England huh, would be interesting. if there are some smart people around that would be able to get enough army-people and logistics to their side it could be an even battle.

[Airman]

It seems hard to have an all-out war on an island....you could call in some of our troops for help.

Anyways, if a group of people threaten to take a place over that's not thier property, then it could be considered a terrorist situation.

[duke_Qa]

would it now? i would have considered it colonization of someone's property.

[MSpencer]

I'm a repubican. I belive in keeping our countries safe.

Shooting communists is less a Republican thing, more of a theme with the Nazis.

[chemical ali]

It seems hard to have an all-out war on an island....you could call in some of our troops for help.

Anyways, if a group of people threaten to take a place over that's not thier property, then it could be considered a terrorist situation.

Highly doubt it, most of the senior armed forces think your troops are shite and would never want to be in another invasion with them again.

[Verrückt]

I think we all should give each side of the issue guns and have them shoot each other other, and then we shall keep everything the same. they died for my entertainment =)

[chemical ali]

Anarchists are usually made up of job less long haired unwashed smelly students so they present no real threat to the interior security forces of the UK. Special branch knows where they all live and men ready to go with silenced Glocks incase of an 'uprising'.

I don't belive something with 'Indie' in, just like the paper full of lefty drival.

[Pastinator]

Sorry, would you say Emma Goldman was an unwashed smelly student?Do you know what she thought about working for jobs?Did you even know she was an anarchist?
This is her position on working: "Ask for work. If they do not give you work, ask for bread. If they do not give you work or bread, take bread."
And in your statment about special branch, who controls the special branch? Who tells them what to do, who gives them power? Who regulates what they cnanot and can do? Who regulates the regualaters?

DESTROY POWER, NOT PEOPLE!

Edited by Pastinator, 16 October 2006 - 08:26 PM.

[chemical ali]

Sorry, would you say Emma Goldman was an unwashed smelly student?Do you know what she thought about working for jobs?Did you even know she was an anarchist?
This is her position on working: "Ask for work. If they do not give you work, ask for bread. If they do not give you work or bread, take bread."
And in your statment about special branch, who controls the special branch? Who tells them what to do, who gives them power? Who regulates what they cnanot and can do? Who regulates the regualaters?

DESTROY POWER, NOT PEOPLE!

Special Branch recieve orders from the Chiefs of Staff of the Joint Inteligence Services Commision which has links with the military's inteligence branches and various support networks. They don't need regulation as it would compromise national security if a civillian agency did that.

[Pastinator]

So, whats to stop them from tellign special branch to do bad stuff, who regulates the regulators? And what is wrong with carrying a magazine with anti-war articles in?

[Airman]

To get a job, you have to go in the place looking good, not like crap.