It wouldn't work. Violence rarely, rarely, solves problems.
Edited by Cheshire Fox, 21 January 2008 - 06:59 PM.
Posted 21 January 2008 - 06:58 PM
Edited by Cheshire Fox, 21 January 2008 - 06:59 PM.
Posted 21 January 2008 - 07:35 PM
Posted 21 January 2008 - 09:43 PM
And then we should kill the person who killed them for being willing to commit cold blooded murder.
It wouldn't work. Violence rarely, rarely, solves problems.
Posted 22 January 2008 - 12:08 AM
He has to earn money to pay for things in life.
Posted 22 January 2008 - 11:26 AM
Posted 22 January 2008 - 12:41 PM
No fuel left for the pilgrims
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:55 PM
Posted 22 January 2008 - 09:06 PM
Posted 22 January 2008 - 11:07 PM
No fuel left for the pilgrims
Posted 23 January 2008 - 01:56 PM
So this is why we ISOLATE them. It has the same effect, without the cold blooded murder.
Posted 23 January 2008 - 02:01 PM
What about the billions of dollars wasted in worthless wars such as Iraq? It's the same thing...All this money could be put towards a better cause, such as cancer research? or some other benifical cause. Would you rather have it wasted on paedophiles or put it towards something useful?
Edited by Alias, 23 January 2008 - 02:01 PM.
Posted 23 January 2008 - 03:20 PM
Paedophiles are sick as well. They're sick humans. Simply killing them because of their state is inhumane.I know this is not going to happen (in UK anyway... all my posts have been based on what happens here... and what I think should happen.) and even if they were killed, it would probably be wasted somewhere else, but I don't like the thaught of spending money to keep a paedophile alive.
No fuel left for the pilgrims
Posted 23 January 2008 - 08:40 PM
Edited by olli, 23 January 2008 - 08:41 PM.
Posted 23 January 2008 - 08:48 PM
No fuel left for the pilgrims
Posted 23 January 2008 - 08:49 PM
If "you" want to murder paedophiles (also known as the "death penalty") then you can pretty much say "you" are planning murder because you a wanting to kill a group of people (actually, that's more of genocide, isn't it?).Also Alias, who is this "you" you speak of? I am not the one doing the killing. Like I said it is the executioners unfortunate job. And even then, he is not murdering someone. He has to do it. I'm sure he wouldn't like to.
Posted 23 January 2008 - 08:49 PM
So this is why we ISOLATE them. It has the same effect, without the cold blooded murder.
The death penalty is not cold blooded murder. You could still terminate their life humanly. Isolating them means money needs to be spent on thier welfare. Attempting to treating them means spending money on them. Keeping them in prison means money.
All this money could be put towards a better cause, such as cancer research? or some other benifical cause. Would you rather have it wasted on paedophiles or put it towards something useful?
Posted 23 January 2008 - 08:58 PM
Edited by olli, 23 January 2008 - 08:58 PM.
Posted 23 January 2008 - 08:59 PM
If "you" want to murder paedophiles (also known as the "death penalty") then you can pretty much say "you" are planning murder because you a wanting to kill a group of people (actually, that's more of genocide, isn't it?).Also Alias, who is this "you" you speak of? I am not the one doing the killing. Like I said it is the executioners unfortunate job. And even then, he is not murdering someone. He has to do it. I'm sure he wouldn't like to.
Posted 23 January 2008 - 09:02 PM
Posted 23 January 2008 - 09:11 PM
That's not what I'm saying. It doesn't matter if you're the one killing them, you still want them dead. Which is "planned/assisted murder" in my books.I'm not planning on going out and killing them personally.... I just think the government should do it.If "you" want to murder paedophiles (also known as the "death penalty") then you can pretty much say "you" are planning murder because you a wanting to kill a group of people (actually, that's more of genocide, isn't it?).Also Alias, who is this "you" you speak of? I am not the one doing the killing. Like I said it is the executioners unfortunate job. And even then, he is not murdering someone. He has to do it. I'm sure he wouldn't like to.
Edited by Alias, 23 January 2008 - 09:11 PM.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users