Alright, let's try to fix this bit of mis-communication then.
Let me first say I do not agree with 2play, im just retelling what I read.
This is the comment it started with, is it not?
Here 2playgames states that it shouldn't be an issue to fire someone before notifying him, if he is going to be fired no matter what he says.
Why warn someone, if you're going to fire him anyway? Just fire him and properly explain the reasons within an hour (if possible).
- The person is going to be fired no matter what he says
- The person is contacted, only after the firing.
- If possible, the person has to be contacted within one hour after being fired.
Your reaction to this, directly with 2plays reaction to that:
You think 2playgames wants to justify the lack of notification around, before and after, the demotions.please, just try to read when responding. i said, why warn someone, when you're going to fire him anyway. sometimes people do such a bad job, that it's not excusable
So let's fire everybody without giving them a chance to actually clarify the situation or communicating with them at all, then let them figure out for themselves that they have been fired? Oh that's such a great idea, I can now see why you are an admin here.
That he didn't.
He said that there shouldn't always have to be a notification before the demotion. As long as there is a notification immediatly after the demotion.
So, he did say there has to be a notification, he just didn't think it should have to be before the demotion.
In his own answer he doesn't react to this aspect., however, Ched does:
Now the use of the word "reasons" is a bit confusing, although it should be clear enough when you read the first post from 2play, not just the second.
oh come on Blodo. Read again and you'll see that reasons are properly given.
What Ched means here is what I have been explaining above, namely that 2playgames is of the opinion that the "reasons" do need to be given. He just thinks they could also be given directly after the demotion, as long as the reasons are given.
I hope this bit of mis communication has been cleared, if not, please explain what is still bothering you about this. Thanks.
I replied to Blodo's post, even though his post was about the past, I only did this because I think the situation is the result of mis communication, and would like to have it cleared. I didn't state my stance on it. Like I said, I would like the discussion about past times to end, and discussion about the future to start.
Believe me, it's clearly visible on the list next to my PC. Perhaps not written down two or three times, but written down big enough.
Solinx: I think you oughta list "fix mis-communication" like two or three times on that list. Just to be sure.