Is just me...
#1
Posted 04 June 2003 - 09:36 AM
Where are these "inescapeable proves" in which Iraqi regime developed these mean weapons of mass destruction able to threat US? Why Tony Blair's leadership is so compromized? Why Bush's administration is heavily accused by several humanitarian (and not) organizations to blatant violations of human rights and illegal war? Why G8 was so useless and the only problem is to make stronger the dollar?
Someone should help me
#2
Posted 04 June 2003 - 01:54 PM
Its easy to understand what is happening with the dollar these days. Euro being valued 20% more than the dollar is obviously armed to benefit USA´s exports and reduce EU´s, USA will experiment higher market possibilities due to it. And whoever changes Euros in dollars might have a potential fortune, whenever relation is 1 to 1 again.
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#3
Posted 04 June 2003 - 03:53 PM
USA has directed attention to Israel-Palestine, the Iraq subject is now not taken into account by most media (sorta like what happened with Afghanistan). Deja Vu?
They did have attenion on Northern Korea, but since China refused to help them, they changed the subject. Whatever Bush does next, I believe it will eventually come flying back in his face. The Fundamentalists/al Queda will do the same thing they did with the Russians.
#5
Posted 04 June 2003 - 10:10 PM
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#8
Posted 05 June 2003 - 05:00 PM
http://www2.cronica....054831266/1/20/ (spanish)
The American Defense Subsecretary, Paul Wolfowitz, admitted oil was the principal cause of the attack on Iraq, in moments in which his government and the British government deny having exagerated or directly lied about the Iraqi menace, Informs this thursday the German press.
"Let´s take a look on this in an easy way. The most important difference between North Korea and Irak is that with Iraq we didnt have other option, economically. The country swims in an oil sea", said by Pentagon´s second in command (Note: Or whatever its said like), according to what the german newspapers Der Tagesspiegel y Die Welt textually say.
If thats true, all the debates on War on Iraq weve sustained here and on other places had actually at least one person being correct.
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#9
Posted 06 June 2003 - 04:09 PM
Sounds like complete crap to me. No American in his position would be that stupid to make a statement like that.
#10
Posted 06 June 2003 - 04:31 PM
Dennis Hastert, Speaker of House of Representatives, Sept 12th, 2001 dixit:
"Yesterday, the American people were viciously and deliberately attacked by terrorists. Make no mistake, this was an act of war. The American people, as represented by the Members of Congress, will take all appropriate action to protect its citizens and to win this war against these terrorists.
We have entered into a new era in world history. Terrorists flout international law and standards of common decency. They target the American people because we are strong and because they are weak. These terrorists are cowards and they will be punished. Some say that we cannot be the world's policeman. Well, if we do not enforce the rules of common decency, if we do not take steps to protect our citizens from these lawless and evil bandits, no one else will.
This is a new kind of war, and we must be prudent in how we prosecute it. All those nations who harbor, who train, who support, who fund these terrorist groups, bear equal responsibility for the actions of these terrorists. We must dedicate the proper resources to deal with them in the appropriate way. Terrorists may be able to run, but they cannot hide from America's steely determination and justice.
Many of those who died were dedicated public servants. Members of our armed forces, firefighters, police officers. People dedicated to serving and protecting America. Others were citizens dedicating to living the American dream, who had wives or husbands or children or parents who loved them and who will miss them. These people were innocent victims in a war conducted against America by cowards. It is time that we start fighting back.
The civilized world is with us. I was touched by the visit of Mr. Howard, the Prime Minister of Australia, who sat in our chamber today to show his solidarity with the American people. The Speaker of the Russian Duma, Mr. Seleznev, sent me a letter where he said: "The people who ordered and carried out this outrageous crime must be found and punished." And our allies across the world have expressed their horror at this unprecedented attack. "
Last time i posted this was in the thread where TAG said America was the biggest nation on Earth, and my quotes on this text can also be found there.
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#11
Posted 07 June 2003 - 02:43 AM
(correct me if im wrong)
#12
Posted 07 June 2003 - 08:35 AM
By the way dan, im starting to suspect that that speech was true, ive just heard the same news in the spanish statal news (and remember Spain supported USA all the way through)
And some interesting news...
http://www.reuters.c...storyID=2889971
http://www.telegraph.../ixnewstop.html
http://www.washingto...4-2003Jun5.html
http://news.independ...sp?story=412775
http://sfgate.com/cg...06/MN163689.DTL
http://news.ft.com/s...p=1012571727102
And some other texts that might go a little extremist on some bits, but nontheless might be worth a read (even if its just to be informed about what its said sometimes).
http://www.nwc.navy....agonsNewMap.htm
http://www.bilderber...global.htm#nazi
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#13
Posted 08 June 2003 - 04:07 AM
#14
Posted 08 June 2003 - 08:10 AM
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#15
Posted 08 June 2003 - 05:06 PM
#16
Posted 08 June 2003 - 06:34 PM
Hitler´s case is something different, its also unclear why he hasnt been found, when the possibility goes there. And a version indicates that neither the Soviet Union nor USA had the intention to find him, however, theres great skepticism on it, and its extremely hard to believe. Though as you said, all is possible until proven impossible.
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#17
Posted 28 June 2003 - 02:01 PM
It's a bit hypocritical, wouldn't you say? America was chasing iraq for WMD when they have enough to dismantle at home...
#18
Posted 28 June 2003 - 02:14 PM
America was chasing iraq for WMD when they have enough to dismantle at home...
What you think Bush would dismantle them?
#19
Posted 28 June 2003 - 03:06 PM
#20
Posted 28 June 2003 - 06:23 PM
Biological and Chemical weapons are a lot easier to make (and destroy/hide if you have a lot of open space like Iraq)
It is also not unlikely that those WMD were smokkeled out of the country. If it is possible to smokkel weapons in, it's possible the other way around also.
Also WMD were NOT the only reason to invade Iraq. The fact that Iraq helped numerous terrorist fractions was another. Several terrorist trainingcamps have been dismantled, some even with small facilities to make chem. weapons. This also raises the question: WHO tought those terrorists how to make those weapons !!!
All things taken into consideration i still believe the war was justified. And if not because of the reasons mentioned above then because it finally freed the Iraqi people from a ruthless dictator.
This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Andre 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
- The mathemathical probability of God existing is 67% -
"We are the Borg. Existence as you know it is over. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile."
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users