T-80um2 "Black Eagle"
#1
Posted 22 March 2007 - 12:58 PM
t80um2.ZIP 13.62KB 592 downloads
#2
Posted 22 March 2007 - 01:23 PM
#5 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 22 March 2007 - 01:52 PM
#6
Posted 22 March 2007 - 01:53 PM
#8
Posted 22 March 2007 - 03:28 PM
#9
Posted 22 March 2007 - 05:55 PM
#13
Posted 23 March 2007 - 05:12 AM
But anyways, please enter Mig Eater, the competition wouldn't be the same without one of your super-detailed aeroplanes!
Edited by TX1138, 23 March 2007 - 05:13 AM.
Realism is so overrated it isn't even funny. You already know what happens in reality, how is that entertaining...?
#14
Posted 23 March 2007 - 03:22 PM
Holy Shit! Make moar, plz!
Well, for RA2, can you make it just a bit bigger and a bit darker, so it fits better in? If you feel like it that is.
#15 Guest_secret_*
Posted 26 May 2007 - 05:19 AM
#16
Posted 26 May 2007 - 11:41 AM
World Domination Status: ▾2.7%
#17 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 26 May 2007 - 02:33 PM
#18
Posted 08 June 2007 - 01:33 PM
This voxel looks like something any of the "cream-of-the-crop" voxellers would have made maybe three years ago, before we had the ideal normal set and the general quality of voxels was comparatively low. While the detail on the voxel is reasonable enough (perhaps the real tank is a bit bland on the surface?) it's certainly not up to your usual standard Mig.
I have the least trained eye for detail in the known universe (I swear, as a sighted person I fall behind blind people in noticing voxel issues) and even I can see those norms are off. That turret just smacks of 'too bright!' and the same goes for the side-skirt.
I can't also help but notice the size of it being a bit below what one might expect for a MBT (the Rhino more or less dwarfs it), and the turret. Admittedly it's fairly true-to-life in which case I should criticise the Russians for making a fugly tank.
So...no. Not what we've come to expect from miggy IMO. :(
Edited by Paradox, 08 June 2007 - 01:34 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users