Jump to content


Photo

Suggestions


  • Please log in to reply
3930 replies to this topic

#2181 Creator

Creator

    The cat

  • Hosted
  • 3,632 posts
  • Location:Moscow, Russia
  • Projects:Contra

Posted 20 January 2008 - 07:51 AM

These are 2 replays of me. Its just true that demo sucks.

Bad replays. Correct playback is impossible.

And no1 is playing as demo gen so wtf are u on about?

There IS demo gen there. I've checked. Just playback is incorrect. The game replaces demo gen with China.

Edited by Creator, 20 January 2008 - 07:59 AM.


#2182 Legend_28

Legend_28
  • Members
  • 64 posts
  • Location:England > Poole
  • Projects:Making Maps.
  •  Loyal Fan to Contra!

Posted 20 January 2008 - 05:06 PM

Even in VZH?
- Regards Jamie

My PC:
Intel Core 2 Duo, (2 CPU's) @ 2.66 Ghz
2048 MB Ram
NVIDIA 8300GS with 512 MB video Ram
19" Wide Screen TFT

- That's why i just own!

#2183 Guest_CheeKy`_*

Guest_CheeKy`_*
  • Guests

Posted 20 January 2008 - 07:43 PM

Creator you get a Serious error? Also the replay with the SWG in it has been used in a guide how to play SWG, also Legend it seems that you lack skill bigtime. http://www.gamerepla...howtopic=323043 every CW player or better players sell their CC as any army.

#2184 Creator

Creator

    The cat

  • Hosted
  • 3,632 posts
  • Location:Moscow, Russia
  • Projects:Contra

Posted 21 January 2008 - 08:09 AM

Even in VZH?

Yes. Even in VZH.
VZH plays it. But it plays incorrectly.

Creator you get a Serious error?

No. I just get wrong replay. Units don't move or they do something very stupid. For example, I saw Dragon tank attacking empty space near enemy base for some minutes. Enemy had whole army standing near it, but nobody tried to attack it. Real players could not do this. It is something wrong with replay. I think that Legend_28 had the same problem.

#2185 Guest_CheeKy`_*

Guest_CheeKy`_*
  • Guests

Posted 21 January 2008 - 01:28 PM

Its not a contra replay if thts what you think.

#2186 Legend_28

Legend_28
  • Members
  • 64 posts
  • Location:England > Poole
  • Projects:Making Maps.
  •  Loyal Fan to Contra!

Posted 22 January 2008 - 01:40 PM

So why the hell are you spamming your pathetic replays on a CONTRA forum?

Edited by Legend_28, 22 January 2008 - 01:40 PM.

- Regards Jamie

My PC:
Intel Core 2 Duo, (2 CPU's) @ 2.66 Ghz
2048 MB Ram
NVIDIA 8300GS with 512 MB video Ram
19" Wide Screen TFT

- That's why i just own!

#2187 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:33 AM

Since the stealth general trusts to hit-and-run tactics and covert ops, couldn't his infantry be more expirienced all-around? Some sort of a Jikhad-cell? They would have different names compared to the normal ones, cost slightly more, have a similar outlook to the jikhad warrior and have some special abilitys, too.

The rpg-tooper would become Jikhad hunter, to who would later be possieble to develop burning missiletips from the palace or scud storm. The enhanced missiles, when shot at enemy vehicles, would light them on fire and they would also slightly increase the hunters effectivity against infantry.

The stinger-tooper would become Jikhad guardian, to who would later be possieble to develop guided-missiles from the palace or scud storm. The guided missiles could be shot at slightly greater range.

The pathfinder would become Jikhad ghost, who would have a similar special action as the Jermen Cell (or whatever he is called). However the ability would have to be developed from palace or scud storm and it would only have a 25% possiebility to take down the driver of a vehicle.

And the Jermen Cell would be changed to Jikhad-commander. He would inspire nearby infantry (like the Jermen Cell) and have the abilitys to call a Jikhad-cell around him (not big though) and create stolen weapons around him. He would be armed with an automatic pistol. Possiebly it would be possieble to develop an another ability to him, an airstrike of some sort? It would have a long reloading time though and it wouldn't be very effective.

The Jikhad warrior wouldn't be changed. :thumbsupsmiley:

#2188 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 24 January 2008 - 10:27 AM

I so agree with suggestion.....jermell kell weapon...is perfect as it is....but maybe add another weapon ability like shot aircraft and helicopter...and all that you suggest..

#2189 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 24 January 2008 - 03:37 PM

Oh, I forgot to ask: Couldn't the stealth general also get a new generals power that would make all(or most) Jíkhad-soldiers to be elite at startup in the fift rank? (two marks)

#2190 Guest_CheeKy`_*

Guest_CheeKy`_*
  • Guests

Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:44 PM

Stealth is based on Stealth tacs. There already is an inf so adding another sucks in my opinion. I like the idea though to get it more special and get some cool ups for it, but I dont think you should give it too much inf/make inf strong. About those replays, u asked for some replays, I posted them. I dont really see the reason to post Contra replays, because there is just no reason to post them lol. Also those normal ZH do show skill so you got an idea that I dont suck. Thts what I was trying to prove :p.

#2191 some_weirdGuy

some_weirdGuy

    title available

  • Hosted
  • 4,080 posts
  • Location:Queensland, Australia
  •  Weird Guy of the Forums

Posted 25 January 2008 - 11:04 PM

Jikhad


wow, ive never head of it being called a Jikhad before, i always though it was a Jihad, is that just a mistake on your part, or is that how you actually say it?

.....
.....
i tried looking for its meaning in a google search, and it just said did you mean "jihad", so i think its suppose to be 'jihad', sorry if i sound pedantic or rude, just though i would point it out to you... go the jihad! :p

"I reject your reality and substitute my own" -Adam Savage, Mythbusters
Posted Image|Posted Image
Posted Image|Posted Image
Posted Image


#2192 Creator

Creator

    The cat

  • Hosted
  • 3,632 posts
  • Location:Moscow, Russia
  • Projects:Contra

Posted 26 January 2008 - 11:46 AM

Oh, I forgot to ask: Couldn't the stealth general also get a new generals power that would make all(or most) Jíkhad-soldiers to be elite at startup in the fift rank? (two marks)

Probably I will make it. Good sugestion.

wow, ive never head of it being called a Jikhad before, i always though it was a Jihad

Both of variants are used. They have the same pronunciation. "Kh" is usually read as "H". Did you know?

Edited by Creator, 26 January 2008 - 11:56 AM.


#2193 Legend_28

Legend_28
  • Members
  • 64 posts
  • Location:England > Poole
  • Projects:Making Maps.
  •  Loyal Fan to Contra!

Posted 26 January 2008 - 05:29 PM

Stealth is based on Stealth tacs. There already is an inf so adding another sucks in my opinion. I like the idea though to get it more special and get some cool ups for it, but I dont think you should give it too much inf/make inf strong. About those replays, u asked for some replays, I posted them. I dont really see the reason to post Contra replays, because there is just no reason to post them lol. Also those normal ZH do show skill so you got an idea that I dont suck. Thts what I was trying to prove :p.


Oh dear, using the replays i saw in the first game u were AFG, and sucked badly, ur team got mullered and u were sending about 4 KR on 1 QC?! And 2nd game, used cheap humma tactics, drive in then away and then AROURA ALPHAS!!!!! Basically taking the mick out of super unbalanced units :wink_new:
- Regards Jamie

My PC:
Intel Core 2 Duo, (2 CPU's) @ 2.66 Ghz
2048 MB Ram
NVIDIA 8300GS with 512 MB video Ram
19" Wide Screen TFT

- That's why i just own!

#2194 Guest_CheeKy`_*

Guest_CheeKy`_*
  • Guests

Posted 27 January 2008 - 08:24 PM

Well first of all in the first game I won a 2v1, I want to see you doing the same. In second game, Hummers are the most commonly used units for USA's so I dont know why its noob etc. Also whats unbalanced about Alphas they cost 2000, you need to tech up to get them, also they die fast. If you are that much better than I am, I would like to see some of your replays or lets play a 1v1 online. Also wouldnt it be cool to give laser a special super weapon instead of particle?

#2195 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 January 2008 - 12:58 PM

...Also wouldnt it be cool to give laser a special super weapon instead of particle?


He is already going to get a new superweapon... :)

#2196 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:40 PM

Assault general is the most "stealthless" GLA general there is and his superweapon is the most hardest to be destroyed and it can also be garrisoned by four infantry units (ironically it's the most weakest superweapon btw.). So couldn't more of his buildings be garrisonable by infantry units? Like, his barracks could be garrisonable by two soldiers and so on? If possieble, couldn't he also get a weaker version of the chinas bunker to his defences? Something that could be more easilier destroyed?



And related to the guestion: Couldn't china get a neat upgrading possiebility for their bunkers?
After a nucreal missile silo would be built, you could research bombshelters-upgrade from there, that would add a hardened underground chamber to the bunker, that would be strong enough to withstand nuke generals nucreal missiles whole punch (but just barely). When the bunker would brake, the garrisoned infantry would run to the chamber and be able to survive there. They couldn't attack from there and it would brake as soon as they all would leave it. It could also be cleared out with flashbangs, flame/toxin streams, and other weapons that would clear regular buildings form infantry? :thumbsupsmiley:

#2197 Red Alpha

Red Alpha
  • Members
  • 79 posts

Posted 01 February 2008 - 06:18 PM

ok I don't know if it is something but I personaly think it could be usefull for usa chinooks:
giving chinooks the ability to deploy NLOS LS boxe for $600

Price:$700
size: about the same sise as a demotrap
range: longrange, slightly less than sublevel 3 artillery
weapon: one standard missile able to target only ground units (launches verticaly)
damage: able to take out one normal tank with 3 or 4 hits
accuracy: hits vehicles but can miss infantry
buildtime: the same time as a demogeneral demotrap
builder: USA chinook (only lowlevel chinooks, no special chinooks)
armor: low, but twice the armor of a demotrap so a battlemaster can take it out in 4 or 5 hits, overlord can take it down with two hits

advantiges: quickly deployable to provide suport at frontline battles, assaults and basedefences
takes less space than a patriot so it can be places in a base to guard against droptroops or ambushes
when deployed in groups it can form a strong artillery defence structure
makes chinook more usefull
quick securing of suplie docks

disadvantiges: weak armor
relative high cost
ineffective against moving infantry
helpless against airplanes
a structure instead of a vehicle so it's firesupport in offencive ways is limited to location

I myself think it would do fine, and have you concidered that old suggestion of mine to make GLA fake buildings garrisonable?

#2198 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 02 February 2008 - 03:10 AM

No..why you give usa almost the ability as GLA and it would be better for GLA to have that sort of ability ....no suitable for USA though...

#2199 for russia!

for russia!
  • Members
  • 123 posts
  • Location:Woodlands, singapore, asia, earth
  • Projects:nil
  •  AKA AZZKIKR

Posted 02 February 2008 - 03:19 AM

V2 defence site for juhziz. replaces arty. fires german V2 rockets to long distances. please respond creator

Edited by for russia!, 02 February 2008 - 09:21 AM.

well, i'm from singapore and now 15 years old. why do u require such information? i will tell you nothing else!

#2200 Septimus

Septimus
  • Members
  • 12 posts

Posted 03 February 2008 - 07:01 AM

Was wondering if China Tank general could had tank bunker instead of bunker for infantry




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users