Suggestions
#3381
Posted 21 March 2011 - 11:55 AM
- in 008 nuke general wont have base defense, so you could drop this idea
- approximated time for finishing trailer should be in 2-3 weeks
- i agree for particle cannon, its a weakest superweapon in game, it was suggested few times, and rejected
- any good suggestion could affect contra 008, but it must be really good because everything is almost ready for release
(yet, some good ideas are still under development between project team)
@kkasll:
- battle fortress is a strong unit, but it can be easy taken down.
The best way to destroy it is this way:
- first attack with few plains
- then with artillery
- if not destroyed use regular units (with some luck or skill, you can defeat it without losing any unit
I guarantee you this!
#3382
Posted 21 March 2011 - 06:51 PM
Victory Loves Preparation
#3383 Guest_ronaldo_*
Posted 21 March 2011 - 07:17 PM
#3384
Posted 22 March 2011 - 02:33 AM
I think every superunit is immune to ECM in 007 onward (balance reason).Iv had best success against super units by using ECM. Disable any superunit with ECM, then they can't fight back because they're ECMed.
#3385
Posted 22 March 2011 - 10:52 AM
I think every superunit is immune to ECM in 007 onward (balance reason).Iv had best success against super units by using ECM. Disable any superunit with ECM, then they can't fight back because they're ECMed.
I know not in 007, because I can remember once I had a Shaitan in online play (on Garena) and they dropped an ECM Bomb right on it. I couldn't move or fire for 2 minutes, then they just sent in all their units to destroy my shaitan. I had same thing happen with the Fafnir before, it's very annoying.
Victory Loves Preparation
#3386
Posted 22 March 2011 - 01:05 PM
#3387 Guest_ronaldo_*
Posted 23 March 2011 - 09:36 PM
#3388 Guest_mm_*
Posted 25 March 2011 - 10:43 AM
#3389
Posted 25 March 2011 - 10:49 AM
Victory Loves Preparation
#3390 Guest_mm_*
Posted 25 March 2011 - 01:57 PM
#3392
Posted 25 March 2011 - 03:12 PM
If you might have noticed, Assault Gen style is more conventional military and less terrorism. He has a unique strength, which is artillery. To play Assault Gen effectively, you must rely artillery (as damage dealer) and mixed other types of units (to defend artillery and finish the enemy). With more conventional military style, Creator removed the suicide units from his arsenal.
If you have follow the change log or news or the trailer, you will see that Assault Gen has new superunit (which is very big and tough artillery) and got a lot of adjustments.
Regarding tunnel and stealth, he has sneak attack tunnel and GPS scrambler in 007. His defenses can be upgraded with camo net too. What you describe is inaccurate. What version did you play?
In 008, he also gets tunnel at rank 1 and stealth tunnel at rank 5.
About Demo dropping Bomb truck, I think there should be balance adjustment, which would remain to be seen.
#3393
Posted 25 March 2011 - 11:11 PM
Edited by fieldwings, 25 March 2011 - 11:15 PM.
#3394 Guest_Nunya bisness_*
Posted 26 March 2011 - 07:54 AM
its not fast but (They did it in ww2 so don't say i am lying) they were camo-netted thus stealthed and meeting hit and run doctrine.
it's not too strong for gla as marauder tank is on par-ish with the overlord when upgraded(Salvage uses).
I have military frends (Not just grunts by the way)who agree With my King tiger beats abrams comments (Some even went as far as to say that it would win in urban combat: The king tiger would have a huge disadvantage in urban combat as the turret moves hellishly slow).
Different ammo for different senarios(H.E. shells for anti-personel and A.P.C.R. Shells-Armour piercing composite rigid-for anti armour make for a fun unit.
The king tiger WAS NOT EVER!! pierced by infantry anti armour (as company of heroes can attest to)And even the mighty kv-2 heavy artillery/Tank (With 40 Kilogram shells i might ad)Had difficulty with its armour.
The king tiger was a dicisive military weapon-fifty light tanks vs a king tiger was a fair fight.
it has enough weaknesses not to be overpowered:Slow,slow turret small-by todays standerds-main gun and not built to withstand modern air based attacks.
maybe consider it as a marouder
#3395
Posted 26 March 2011 - 10:30 AM
#3396
Posted 26 March 2011 - 11:00 AM
You have incured my wrath. for the last month-ish i have thought about the king tiger as a gla assault general unit and made my argument: The king tiger might have an outdated 88mm main gun but that is still going to murder light tanks (Thats sort of the heavy tanks job).
its not fast but (They did it in ww2 so don't say i am lying) they were camo-netted thus stealthed and meeting hit and run doctrine.
it's not too strong for gla as marauder tank is on par-ish with the overlord when upgraded(Salvage uses).
I have military frends (Not just grunts by the way)who agree With my King tiger beats abrams comments (Some even went as far as to say that it would win in urban combat: The king tiger would have a huge disadvantage in urban combat as the turret moves hellishly slow).
Different ammo for different senarios(H.E. shells for anti-personel and A.P.C.R. Shells-Armour piercing composite rigid-for anti armour make for a fun unit.
The king tiger WAS NOT EVER!! pierced by infantry anti armour (as company of heroes can attest to)And even the mighty kv-2 heavy artillery/Tank (With 40 Kilogram shells i might ad)Had difficulty with its armour.
The king tiger was a dicisive military weapon-fifty light tanks vs a king tiger was a fair fight.
it has enough weaknesses not to be overpowered:Slow,slow turret small-by todays standerds-main gun and not built to withstand modern air based attacks.
maybe consider it as a marouder
Yet, current anti tank infantry arms would shred it. Also, current arty uses much more heavy shells. Let alone rocket artillery which utilize anti tank missiles, HE missile, or even thermobaric/nuclear charges. King tiger wouldnt be able to do something about those.
#3397 Guest_mm_*
Posted 26 March 2011 - 11:40 AM
#3398
Posted 26 March 2011 - 03:58 PM
#3399 Guest_ronaldo_*
Posted 26 March 2011 - 07:05 PM
WHY EVERYTHING IS UP TO CREATOR
IF EVERYTHING IS UP TO CREATOR THEN WE MIGHT SAY AN IDEA YOU DON'T LIKE CASOJIN BUT CREATOR LIKE IT AND YOU SAY WHEN ANYTHING YOU ANSWER THEN CREATOR WILL NOT READ IT BUT IF NOBODY ANSWER HE MIGHT READ IT AND LIKES IT SO NOW CREATOR NEVER ANSWER US ONLY YOU CASOJIN AND LIL TASMAN AND dcesarec ANSWER US.
#3400
Posted 26 March 2011 - 08:30 PM
Victory Loves Preparation
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users