Homosexuality
#1
Posted 12 August 2007 - 04:33 PM
And just to make it worse for the first voter, I'm going to sit on the fence and give a null vote.
#2
Posted 12 August 2007 - 05:27 PM
To the second question I'm in between, I really want to stay out of that discussion tbh.
So that's what I have to say, let's hope this topic doesn't go downhill.
Soul 2.4
Background process. Has something to do with some activity going on somewhere. Sorting junkmail, I think. No value or interest. Doesn't do much except hog resource.
#4
Posted 12 August 2007 - 05:58 PM
Maybe an additional poll question ('do you ignore/deny the matter until confronted or are you expecting others you meet to possibly be homosexual/bisexual?') would actually show a more precise stance on the matter.
I voted VA on both counts, and my experience has shown that meeting someone who is not strictly heterosexual is pretty common. Bisexuality is of course hard to spot (for reasons i won't get into now) so it tends to show only when you get to know someone pretty well.
Axed Head and A.I. Coder for S.E.E. and ... stuff
".. coding is basically boring. What's fun is finding out how things work, take them apart and then put them together in ways that were not intended nor even conceived."
#5
Posted 12 August 2007 - 06:07 PM
Command & Conquer Mods, Mods Support, Public Researchs, Map Archives, Tutorials, Tools, A Friendly Community and much more. Check it out now!
#6
Posted 12 August 2007 - 06:15 PM
2) Same. I don't give a damn what other people say or do.
3)Answered 3, 4, or 5
#7
Posted 12 August 2007 - 06:33 PM
If the person wanna be homossexual or bissexual or change their gender... it's their business, not mine. As long as this person respects me as heterossexual, I'm fine with it. Regarding transgender, the same thing applies... but I don't want to have any kind of sexual relationship with males that became females..
I would like to ask what exactly describes 'being respectful'.
- Would it be unrespectful to disclose this state to you when talking to you (assuming now that talking about heterosex in general isn't disrespectful)?
- Would hitting on you be disrespectful (even though it would show your attractive potential and should be rather flattering)?
- Would two men or two women kissing each other publicly be disrespectful (also assuming that public kissing between opposite sexes is acceptable)?
- Would it be disrepectful to NOT assume that anyone you meet is heterosexual, thereby legitimizing (sexual) advances of the homosexual kind (assuming sexual advances in general are acceptable)?
But it also has to be said that there is no correlation, positive or negative, between the presence/absence of consent and the actual gender of the participants.
Axed Head and A.I. Coder for S.E.E. and ... stuff
".. coding is basically boring. What's fun is finding out how things work, take them apart and then put them together in ways that were not intended nor even conceived."
#8
Posted 12 August 2007 - 07:38 PM
Can anyone really make a case for homosexuality being morally repulsive? If so, how is it any more morally repulsive than heterosexuality? Homosexuality has been observed in certain primate species and in other species outside the group as well, so the "it's natural" excuse for being a closed-minded pseudo-fascist are out the window. The whole god says it's wrong thing, as argued against by Caspa, is positively repulsive. Intolerant people have no legs to stand on these days, but we still let them get away with it in the United States and around the world. I have a serious issue continuing to live in a country where I am not completely accepted for who I am, and it just underscores the fact that it is time to leave the theocracy of the United States which is so ruled by some arcane world view of an intolerant, unaccepting, positively ridiculous collection of institutions as the modern Christian church. I'll stop now before I give the bible-bashers more ammunition against me.
Edited by MSpencer, 12 August 2007 - 07:40 PM.
#9
Posted 13 August 2007 - 09:33 PM
On the religious side of things, frankly I just don't know what to believe anymore. Should I join a religion with the promise of eternal bliss, but which defies every law of physics and preaches that our natural sexual urges are the work of the devil, heterosexual or homosexual? Or should I be an atheist and believe that nothing comes after life and we managed to draw the right evolutionary card out of a deck of billions? Currently I'm an agnostic, but I'd love to believe in reincarnation. In fact, reincarnion is possibly the most credible of any religious or quasi-religious beliefs.
#10
Posted 13 August 2007 - 09:59 PM
But on a lighter note, my wife sent this joke to me today. I had a good laugh. Sometimes it pays to be gay, sometimes quite well.
Four friends, who hadn't seen each other in 30
years, reunited at a party. After several
drinks, one of the men had to use the rest
room. Those who remained talked about their
kids. The first guy said, "My son is my pride
and joy. He started working at a successful
company at the bottom of the barrel. He studied
Economics and Business Administration and soon
began to climb the corporate ladder and now
he's the president of the company. He became so
rich that he gave his best friend a top of the
line Mercedes for his birthday."
The second guy said, "Darn, that's terrific! My
son is also my pride and joy. He started
working for a big airline, and then went to
flight school to become a pilot. Eventually he
became a partner in the company, where he owns
the majority of its assets. He's so rich that
he gave his best friend a brand new jet for his
birthday."
The third man said: "Well, that's terrific! My
son studied in the best universities and became
an engineer. Then he started his own
construction company and is now a
multimillionaire. He also gave away something
very nice and expensive to his best friend for
his birthday: A 30,000 square foot mansion."
The three friends congratulated each other just
as the fourth returned from the restroom and
asked: "What are all the congratulations for?"
One of the three said: "We were talking about
the pride we feel for the successes of our
sons. What about your son?"
The fourth man replied: "My son is gay and
makes a living dancing as a stripper at a
nightclub."
The three friends said: "What a shame... what a
disappointment. "
The fourth man replied: "No, I'm not ashamed.
He's my son and I love him. And he hasn't done
too bad either. His birthday was two weeks ago,
and he received a beautiful 30,000 square foot
mansion, a brand new jet and a top of the line
Mercedes from his three boyfriends.
Save the environment, use green text
Some Bullshit Somewhere
#11
Posted 13 August 2007 - 11:40 PM
#12
Posted 15 August 2007 - 01:14 AM
Quotes
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel
Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56
#13
Posted 15 August 2007 - 08:36 AM
Agreed. This is why I put A instead of VA for transgender.Regarding transgender, the same thing applies... but I don't want to have any kind of sexual relationship with males that became females..
I can answer these for myself, though others might say or think differently:I would like to ask what exactly describes 'being respectful'.
I would consider telling me upfront respectful. That way I could be respectful on grounds I wasn't deceived. If I were to go with someone only to find later they weren't really a woman, I would be a LOT more angry than if I were to find out as we sat down to a first date, sorta thing.Would it be unrespectful to disclose this state to you when talking to you (assuming now that talking about heterosex in general isn't disrespectful)?
I've been hit on by gays before. I won't deny it does freak me out a little bit, but I don't admit such. I just say "sorry, I'm not gay. Nice to meet you though."Would hitting on you be disrespectful (even though it would show your attractive potential and should be rather flattering)?
Public kissing between opposite sexes IS acceptable. So yeah, I see no reason why they shouldn't, whatsoever. Kissing someone you've got the hots for isn't/shouldn't be taboo, regardless of how their gender is similar or dissimilar to yours.Would two men or two women kissing each other publicly be disrespectful (also assuming that public kissing between opposite sexes is acceptable)?
I'm not sure how it legitimises a homosexual advance, or why either would be unacceptable or acceptable. By default, I assume anyone I meet is heterosexual unless there is an obvious sign that they are not (way of speech, way of dress, etc).[*]Would it be disrepectful to NOT assume that anyone you meet is heterosexual, thereby legitimizing (sexual) advances of the homosexual kind (assuming sexual advances in general are acceptable)?
Unless (and as seems more likely in hindsight) you're referring to it from a homosexual's point of view (as in, they may not assume that anyone they meet is heterosexual). In which case, I wouldn't consider it to be disrespectful. While on some people it's easy to tell they're gay. Others are much less open and obvious about it, and lesbians are even MORE difficult to tell apart for the most part. So, it's gotta be understood that they have a harder time picking a mate than a heterosexual person. Mistakes are gonna be made.
Wait, what?But it also has to be said that there is no correlation, positive or negative, between the presence/absence of consent and the actual gender of the participants.
Well...that's...kind of the right attitude...I do not care, its their life as long as the state doesn't fund operations or crap like than then its all good for democracy and society.
#14
Posted 15 August 2007 - 10:23 AM
I was saying, having sex with someone you don't want to have sex with is just wrong.Wait, what?And i agree with you regarding unconsenting sex. That's just never allright. Period.Regarding transgender, the same thing applies... but I don't want to have any kind of sexual relationship with males that became females..
But it also has to be said that there is no correlation, positive or negative, between the presence/absence of consent and the actual gender of the participants.
But this is neither predominant to 'queer' sex nor restricted to it. But misconceptions and surprises of the shaming kind are more common (see below).
I would consider telling me upfront respectful. That way I could be respectful on grounds I wasn't deceived. If I were to go with someone only to find later they weren't really a woman, I would be a LOT more angry than if I were to find out as we sat down to a first date, sorta thing.Would it be unrespectful to disclose this state to you when talking to you (assuming now that talking about heterosex in general isn't disrespectful)?
I'm not sure how it legitimises a homosexual advance, or why either would be unacceptable or acceptable. By default, I assume anyone I meet is heterosexual unless there is an obvious sign that they are not (way of speech, way of dress, etc).Would it be disrepectful to NOT assume that anyone you meet is heterosexual, thereby legitimizing (sexual) advances of the homosexual kind (assuming sexual advances in general are acceptable)?
Unless (and as seems more likely in hindsight) you're referring to it from a homosexual's point of view (as in, they may not assume that anyone they meet is heterosexual). In which case, I wouldn't consider it to be disrespectful. While on some people it's easy to tell they're gay. Others are much less open and obvious about it, and lesbians are even MORE difficult to tell apart for the most part. So, it's gotta be understood that they have a harder time picking a mate than a heterosexual person. Mistakes are gonna be made.
It would seem that the main issue regarding how uncomfortable dealing with queer people as a heterosexual is 'comfort', or rather the degree to which one is accustomed to adopt a very different point of view. This is not easy, i agree, as it involves not a small bit of assuming the 'other' role yourself. But it is something we do on a daily basis with other people. The only difference is that it is not as uncomfortable to imagine the POV of, say, a seller of newspapers on the market. And that is because you are already used to it.
The matter 'respect when told upfront' also has two sides. It is of course very decent if someone assumes you are not familiar with 'queer' stuff and gives you an easy time to deal with it. On the other hand, as a 'decent queer' you always run with the danger of getting a really queer response (pun intended). So the fear of discrimination is constantly hanging over your shoulder.
I believe it would also be pretty decent to take that into account when someone is not so apparently queer and you find out much later in a not surprisingly more shaming situation.
Some people also seem to feel disrespected when someone shows up saying 'Hey, i am gay, just so you know', flaunting it in their face.
It's not really different from, say, having different expectations in other day to day situations. Imagine a heterosexual couple getting it on for the first time only to discover that every one had something pretty different in mind when thinking 'sex'.
In this regard, heterosex has the advantage of having at least one smallest common denominator. The praxis that leads to having children is pretty common knowledge and on the minds of many people when the word 'sex' is dropped.
Queer sex has an advantage as well, right on the opposite side of the coin. Since most 'queer' people get their first indoctrination with a hetero-bend, they assume pretty fast an attitude of 'don't just assume anything until you know for sure', which is a pretty modern (though really necessary) stance, much like science is compared to religion.
But i am not saying one is better than the other. I believe it is proper (even if hard at times) to take a different point of view into account when judging people, situations and your own emotional response to them. Just as it is ok to feel uncomfortable at times. Once you get used to it, it can be enriching.
Think of your first day at school. Mine was a horror. But after a while i made some friends. After a while longer i even liked going there.
Edited by Sûlherokhh, 15 August 2007 - 11:18 AM.
Axed Head and A.I. Coder for S.E.E. and ... stuff
".. coding is basically boring. What's fun is finding out how things work, take them apart and then put them together in ways that were not intended nor even conceived."
#15
Posted 17 August 2007 - 08:10 PM
#16
Posted 17 August 2007 - 09:36 PM
Old Quotes:
@Mspencer : RoadReaction is calling everyone in your country a fascist invader who wants to invade Russia.
@Jeeves: Pie.
#17
Posted 26 August 2007 - 11:21 PM
#18
Posted 26 August 2007 - 11:25 PM
You're kidding right?
No fuel left for the pilgrims
#19
Posted 27 August 2007 - 04:55 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users