Women you've had bad experiences with
#61
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:24 PM
#62
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:25 PM
#63
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:26 PM
What relevance does my gender have if I will be more of a person than you'll ever be?Why am I calling him a 'he', he's anti-man therefore he shall be named as 'it' from this point on.
So now you've become a furry you've metamorphed into some animal/human gender, thats just fucking sick and quite odd.
Quotes
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel
Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56
#64
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:28 PM
Grow up ali...........
#65
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:29 PM
Ok now that was low ali .What relevance does my gender have if I will be more of a person than you'll ever be?Why am I calling him a 'he', he's anti-man therefore he shall be named as 'it' from this point on.
So now you've become a furry you've metamorphed into some animal/human gender, thats just fucking sick and quite odd.
Edited by Soul, 25 August 2007 - 11:29 PM.
Soul 2.4
Background process. Has something to do with some activity going on somewhere. Sorting junkmail, I think. No value or interest. Doesn't do much except hog resource.
#66
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:31 PM
Ali is sort of correct. Well... other than the assuming code to be a 'it' like me, but assuming he is being sort of hippicritical.
#67
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:32 PM
But one can try........
#68
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:35 PM
Quotes
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel
Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56
#69
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:39 PM
Wow. I didn't know you had failed relationships with every single woman on earth. I kind of feel sorry now...And what about the criticism that I've thrown out. Most of it coming from personal experience. I've lived through enough to say once and for all that women are nothing more than snakes with tits.
#70
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:43 PM
I'm assuming you're talking about me........Who are all these random newbies that are saying 'lol dont do it'.
I'm not that new......Just because you've never seen me doesn't mean I'm new
Caspa, you know there is some good women out there, even if they are outnumbered 1000-1.......
Edited by Elvenlord, 25 August 2007 - 11:45 PM.
#71
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:45 PM
#72
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:45 PM
Oh, I got all my info from that one post alone. Here, I'll clarify it for you:Try reading my previous posts instead of getting all presumptuous.
You say that from personal experience you can say that women are... whatever they are. I can only conclude, logically, that you have tried and failed to have a relationship with every woman. Because otherwise, you would be in no authority to make such a statement. And I doubt you would have made such a statement without having the neccessary experimental results to verify it.I've lived through enough to say once and for all that women are...
#73
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:50 PM
this has obuivisoly elevated to the obxnious level so I'm back in
Does anyone else think that code cat is a streotyping
Can't you people behave for once? This topic is very insulting to women and I feel like closing it right now. But I'll give you another chance.
Men have abused and treated women as property for centuries. Now it's payback, get over it.
and there is more I just don't feel like quoteing themSo if you all hate women so much, why aren't you gay?
Edited by The Best Guest, 25 August 2007 - 11:51 PM.
#74
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:51 PM
#75
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:53 PM
#76
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:54 PM
Yes I do.Well, this topic itself is far more stereotyping than I have been. After all, this topic is supposed to be about women, meaning all women (if not, which then?). But so far it has been only about the women people have had bad relationships with. So I believe a topic title change is in order, don't you?
Soul 2.4
Background process. Has something to do with some activity going on somewhere. Sorting junkmail, I think. No value or interest. Doesn't do much except hog resource.
#77
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:55 PM
Capsa: These people suck.
CodeCat: No, you suck
Only one person having to defend from critisizim.
#78
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:58 PM
by properly I don't mean know how to give her a good time in the sack either.
Edited by Rawlo, 25 August 2007 - 11:59 PM.
Ctrl+Alt+Del - A webcomic for the gamer in all of us
A final good night Burnie, sleep well mate, rest in peace
Goodbye Tig, you are sorely missed.
Goodbye to you aswell till, you'll also be missed
Xeno, RIP mate
"I'm going to go on the record and say that any substance abuse problem which creates women like that is ok by me"
#79
Posted 25 August 2007 - 11:59 PM
Oh. Well, as you say it, you're criticising 'these people'. That can be taken two ways. You may be criticising all women, but that would be validating my claim that some people in this thread have had bad experiences with every single woman on earth. In the other case, where it is only about a select group of women, I think the new title fits very well.Not really... The conversation is sort of like this...
Capsa: These people suck.
CodeCat: No, you suck
Only one person having to defend from critisizim.
#80
Posted 26 August 2007 - 12:03 AM
Soul 2.4
Background process. Has something to do with some activity going on somewhere. Sorting junkmail, I think. No value or interest. Doesn't do much except hog resource.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users