26 replies to this topic

[Helge129]

Hi.

I have a little question...

Which of both railguns shall I use for Tiberian Apocalypse?

This one (Realistic)



Or this one? (EA Style)

[GodSun666]

I would go for the EA Style!


KUTGW!

[Phil]

I'd personally go with the realistic one

[Nighthawk]

Yeah, the realistic one looks better IMO.

[Torn]

The realistic one. But how can a railgun be realistic, lol.

[Helge129]

Railguns already exist.

[Torn]

Yeah, because their random lab experiments mean that your massive railgun mounted on a platform looks realistic because?

[Helge129]

random lab experiments? You call a functional naval railgun "random"?

[GodSun666]

The second turret could be used as some kind of laser turret? It suite's a laser gun better or such?

[Helge129]

No. That will never be a laser turret.

[GodSun666]

Lol, well my imagantion can be pretty crazy !

[Mighty BOB!]

I'd personally go with the realistic one

*Me adds nothing new to the conversation*

[Helge129]

My desision: I'll take both.

The ea-style will be a pulse blaster and the realistic one the railgun

[Hostile]

why not use one as an electrical discharge weapon or a Tesla weapon or something,

[Helge129]

It fires high energy bolts..so its basically eqaul^^

[Helge129]

I has unwraped railgun

[Helge129]

More WIP shots.

[Hostile]

Ouch they both are looking real good. I'd say keep them both, have them serve 2 differant functions. I like what I see.

[Torn]

Erm... you know it would look better if you kind of actually fill the whole area of the uv rather than leaving dirty edges on the outside of every face.

Adding detail helps too? The base is just one solid colour with the horrid looking grey edges, as is the rest of the model tbh. There's no colour variation whatsoever.

[Stygs]

That may be because the textures are Work In Progress and nowhere near finished....

Edited by Chriz, 14 October 2007 - 12:38 PM.