In addition I am used to 150x150.
Would that be a possible change?
Edited by Solinx, 14 January 2008 - 10:47 PM.
Added poll
Posted 13 January 2008 - 02:29 AM
Edited by Solinx, 14 January 2008 - 10:47 PM.
Added poll
Posted 13 January 2008 - 04:44 AM
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
Posted 13 January 2008 - 05:02 AM
World Domination Status: ▾2.7%
Posted 13 January 2008 - 11:20 AM
Edited by Alias, 13 January 2008 - 11:22 AM.
Posted 13 January 2008 - 04:07 PM
Posted 13 January 2008 - 06:19 PM
If you meet me:
Have some courtesy,
Have some sympathy,
And some taste.
Use all your well-learned politesse,
Or I'll lay your soul to waste.
Posted 13 January 2008 - 07:21 PM
My Political Compass
Sieben Elefanten hatte Herr Dschin
Und da war dann noch der achte.
Sieben waren wild und der achte war zahm
Und der achte war's, der sie bewachte.
Posted 13 January 2008 - 07:50 PM
Edited by Aro, 13 January 2008 - 07:51 PM.
Posted 13 January 2008 - 09:42 PM
Posted 13 January 2008 - 10:29 PM
Edited by Kacen, 13 January 2008 - 10:29 PM.
Posted 14 January 2008 - 12:04 AM
Posted 14 January 2008 - 12:17 AM
Posted 14 January 2008 - 12:20 AM
Posted 14 January 2008 - 12:57 AM
Yet there will be NO detrimental effect WITH a dimension increase... as I've said before, even at 150x150, the avatar DOES NOT stretch the left hand column, and dimensions do not judge the file size of an image.100 or 110 are fine. 150 is too much. I think it is more important to see more posts in the screen than people's avatar. We read topics because of the contents of the posts, not because of avatars.
Edited by Alias, 14 January 2008 - 01:00 AM.
Posted 14 January 2008 - 01:07 AM
Posted 14 January 2008 - 01:08 AM
Edited by Juggernaut2008, 14 January 2008 - 01:11 AM.
Posted 14 January 2008 - 01:20 AM
That has a lot more to do with sigs than avatars. I do think my current sig is large (it's within your guidelines...), it stretches the page (but hey, there's some ones that are twice as bad). But that's not to do with avatars, is it?Check the first posts of this topic to see how avatars actually do a lot of difference and how bigger avatars would do even more difference. In this forum, it is hard to see more than two posts in the same screen. You always need to scroll it. Don't you think it is annoying?
Edited by Alias, 14 January 2008 - 01:26 AM.
Posted 14 January 2008 - 01:30 AM
Actually, I don't think your signature is within the guidelines. Please make it smaller heightwise.That has a lot more to do with sigs than avatars. I do think my current sig is large (it's within your guidelines...), it stretches the page (but hey, there's some ones that are twice as bad). But that's not to do with avatars, is it?
And what is so bad with only being able to read 2 posts at time? That is practically normal.
Too cute! | Server Status: If you can read this, it's up |Well, when it comes to writing an expository essay about counter-insurgent tactics, I'm of the old school. First you tell them how you're going to kill them. Then you kill them. Then you tell them how you just killed them.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users