25 replies to this topic

[Phil]

That won't change in the foreseeable future though.

[DIGI_Byte]

I'm aware of that, but you hafto admit its pretty cool don't you think?

Any reason why though? Im sure if we could have some way of allowing it. I mean it cant be to bad, you might get some that wouldn't be approved like url redirects or pop ups, but i could do some pretty bad things even with out them, ie you can post obscene images of sorts, or just and insanely large image the process would still get the Sig removed.

Edited by DIGI_Byte, 12 September 2008 - 11:51 AM.

[DIGI_Byte]

you where being a smart ass, and quite rude.. even logged in your still a rude ass and i will not tolerate that around me, please learn some manners and if you where offering me advice, find a better way to to show it with out hiding your messages behind immature flaming.

Edited by DIGI_Byte, 13 September 2008 - 04:33 PM.

[DIGI_Byte]

One would like to, but one simply could not give a fuck.

And yet you bother to post such a pointless post?

Please keep your personal opinions to your self and stay on topic. Quite being a smart arse and if your actually trying, You've got a long way to go.

[Phil]

Stop it, guys. It would be a pity if I had to lock the topic.

@DIGI_Byte: We won't enable Flash because it's completely unnecessary, calls for even more annoying animated signatures, increases the document file size a lot and, if I'm not mistaken, also puts security at stake. We will neither enable HTML, nor Flash in signatures. Live with it.

[DIGI_Byte]

Im aware of that, I know about Flash and code for AS2, I was particularly asking as to your views with flash signatures.

Id like to know how come my images cant be on a different line with different url with out a double line break like your sig. Could I get a copy of your code to check it out?

Edited by DIGI_Byte, 14 September 2008 - 09:23 PM.