Posted 12 September 2008 - 09:34 AM
Any reason why though? Im sure if we could have some way of allowing it. I mean it cant be to bad, you might get some that wouldn't be approved like url redirects or pop ups, but i could do some pretty bad things even with out them, ie you can post obscene images of sorts, or just and insanely large image the process would still get the Sig removed.
Edited by DIGI_Byte, 12 September 2008 - 11:51 AM.
Posted 13 September 2008 - 04:31 PM
Edited by DIGI_Byte, 13 September 2008 - 04:33 PM.
Posted 13 September 2008 - 09:18 PM
One would like to, but one simply could not give a fuck.
And yet you bother to post such a pointless post?
Please keep your personal opinions to your self and stay on topic. Quite being a smart arse and if your actually trying, You've got a long way to go.
Posted 14 September 2008 - 01:01 AM
@DIGI_Byte: We won't enable Flash because it's completely unnecessary, calls for even more annoying animated signatures, increases the document file size a lot and, if I'm not mistaken, also puts security at stake. We will neither enable HTML, nor Flash in signatures. Live with it.
My Political Compass
Sieben Elefanten hatte Herr Dschin
Und da war dann noch der achte.
Sieben waren wild und der achte war zahm
Und der achte war's, der sie bewachte.
Posted 14 September 2008 - 09:23 PM
Id like to know how come my images cant be on a different line with different url with out a double line break like your sig. Could I get a copy of your code to check it out?
Edited by DIGI_Byte, 14 September 2008 - 09:23 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users