And We Wonder Why Americans Own Guns...
#122
Posted 29 September 2008 - 01:18 AM
Organic Weapons? Geez, these people are insane.
owned lol
#124
Posted 29 September 2008 - 10:58 AM
Anyway, to stop dragging this a mile and a half off topic, guns do not equal drugs, the situation is far from the same in every respect except that in which they are both illegal in lots of countries.
It seems strange to me that guns, designed to kill other people, should be legal, when drugs, only some of which cause harm to your own body, are illegal. While you might argue that drug crime is a serious issue, you will also have to admit that most drug crime-related deaths are caused by guns, not the drugs themselves. It's a vicious spiral, but it is the guns that cause the ultimate harm.
#125
Posted 29 September 2008 - 11:51 AM
You have to take the American character into consideration. Any time something is illegal, it makes it more desirable. Alcohol, when it was outlawed, drugs, and guns, if they are outlawed.
....And I think some of the softer drugs should be legal.It seems strange to me that guns, designed to kill other people, should be legal, when drugs, only some of which cause harm to your own body, are illegal. While you might argue that drug crime is a serious issue, you will also have to admit that most drug crime-related deaths are caused by guns, not the drugs themselves. It's a vicious spiral, but it is the guns that cause the ultimate harm.
So we can tax and regulate it if nothing else
Not caused by guns. They're caused by drugs, hence drug crime. Guns are nothing more than a means to an end. You have to realise that. It's the person wielding it, not the object itself. Objects can't be evil.
Now, for the kill all reason. We have guns so we can't be oppressed by ours or any other government. And let me tell you, I feel like rebelling right now
But killing any opposition is no fun, so ignore it
............Sorry, I couldn't stay away
#126
Posted 30 September 2008 - 09:34 PM
Edited by Puppeteer, 30 September 2008 - 09:34 PM.
#127
Posted 01 October 2008 - 01:39 AM
I know it was in context, it still doesn't change the fact that you called me a redneck, intended or not, I take that as an offense, no where did it say if it were meant or not, even if it were to be implied I still have my doubts.General Jenkins, going back to the context thing, see the quotation marks? I never meant it, it's a rebuttal to something Beowulf said earlier. His was on purpose, mine was how you could refute it now THAT'S context.
Edited by General Jenkins, 01 October 2008 - 01:39 AM.
#128
Posted 01 October 2008 - 04:13 PM
You don't otherwise you would've seen that I didn't mean it! Look:I know it was in context
We could come up with our own:
If I would've said will, then I would have meant it. It was in response to Beowulf's completely unimportant rant which tried to force us to realize that insulting someone + telling them to "grow a pair" would persuade them onto their side of the arguement. It was irrelevant and unnecessary, so my speech-marked post was about how that's unfair, and can play 2 ways.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users