I'm afraid the only thing that Fascist Nut of a leader is going to get is a Modern Day Fallout.
If you think Kim Jong Il is a Fascist then you're gravely mistaken.
North Korea to 'Test Missile Capable of Striking U.S.'
Started by Hostile, Feb 03 2009 06:29 AM
23 replies to this topic
#21
Casen
-
- Members
-
- 1,039 posts
title available
Posted 10 March 2009 - 05:48 PM
If you think Kim Jong Il is a Fascist then you're gravely mistaken.
#22
Rafv Nin IV
-
- Members
-
- 1,224 posts
Vermin of Revora
- Projects:RPG Frontier
Posted 11 March 2009 - 12:16 AM
The point of NK getting better and better balistic missiles is simple; it's the same reason that the SETI treaties targeted intercepting defense missiles and not actual offensive missiles: mutually assurred destruction. If NK can obtain the ability to nuke LA, San Francisco, Sacramento, Portland and Seattle, then they are mostly secure against an American (or allied power's) invasion/attack. It doesn't matter that NK would be flattened in a conflict; the American government is not going to risk having major cities attacked and as such will treat any nation that can retaliate with nukes with more respect.
#23
partyzanPaulZy
-
- Members
-
- 576 posts
"quarawr!"
- Location:The Czech Republic
- Projects:Corruption Of Power - YR mod
- doing my mod alone till 1st release (then will see)
Posted 11 March 2009 - 07:17 PM
Exactly!
to that fascist thing:
Kim Jong Il is typical neostalinist. There is no other country with such regime like in NK. Only NK is stalinistic.
And as we know, Stalin was like Hitler, same beast. And some people say Stalin was de facto fascist...
to that fascist thing:
Kim Jong Il is typical neostalinist. There is no other country with such regime like in NK. Only NK is stalinistic.
And as we know, Stalin was like Hitler, same beast. And some people say Stalin was de facto fascist...
"Soviet Union was a superpower and each superpower needs at least 1 war at 5 years to keep army in a good condition." ... my grandpa. USA create wars more frequently.
#24
Casen
-
- Members
-
- 1,039 posts
title available
Posted 17 March 2009 - 02:56 AM
Yeah, just because there's a dictatorship doesn't mean something is Fascist.
It has to be Corporatist and Nationalist as well. He's an authoritarian communist.
It has to be Corporatist and Nationalist as well. He's an authoritarian communist.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
