I would except for one little thing... I'm not gay.Take one for the team Wulf.
that question...
#22
Posted 15 July 2009 - 11:27 PM
Well, no, cause you can be straight, gay, or bi... not much else you can be unless you start unnecessarily splitting it up (for example 'straight for blond women' and 'open for experimentation' [yeah thats right vort, i'm dissing your added option ]) Those are still heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual.eh, personally i don't believe in these words. i am straight myself but i doubt that your brain is grouped so easily.
You are either straight, or you're not. If you're not then you are either fully gay, or bisexual. The words mean one thing or the other, theres no two ways, or half way, about them.
Straight means you like women and not men, straight means completely straight, heterosexual. It doesn't matter what sort of women, it doesn't matter if you are 'mostly straight although open to being gay at times' cause that means you are bisexual(like both), not straight. You are one of the three and theres no other alternatives (unless you have 'nonsexual' as an option which i don't think anyone could truly be).
Unless someone would like to argue the point?
#23
Posted 15 July 2009 - 11:47 PM
Oh come on... you're bi. You're half way there.I would except for one little thing... I'm not gay.Take one for the team Wulf.
#24
Posted 16 July 2009 - 06:14 AM
asexual is the same thing as nonsexual(unless you have 'nonsexual' as an option which i don't think anyone could truly be)
#26
Posted 16 July 2009 - 09:41 PM
#27
Posted 17 July 2009 - 02:37 PM
#28
Posted 18 July 2009 - 05:44 AM
It is? Oh, I do have an option.asexual is the same thing as nonsexual
Edited by {IP}Pasidon, 18 July 2009 - 05:49 AM.
#29
Posted 18 July 2009 - 06:37 AM
Ok vort, an visual aid:
X = Straight
- = Bi
and O = Gay
X---------------------------O
Straight and gay are the two extremes on the chart, all the rest is Bi, it doesn't matter how close you are to either, anywhere between is still Bi.
#30
Posted 18 July 2009 - 08:47 AM
And I'd say your chart is wrong too. I will grant you that few are exclusively one thing but being in the middle doesn't actually make you bisexual. You actually need to have a true sexual attraction to be in the middle. Experimentation doesn't mean bisexuality since an experiment has two possible outcomes - positive or negative. You can extrapolate your own data based on that but the simple fact is that people can be in the middle but not be bi. Vort would be a good example of that actually.
NZ.org | BBPCG
Discord: The Astronomer#1314
Steam
#31
Posted 20 July 2009 - 03:13 AM
Of course, I've never been blindfolded and then given a blowjob, so this is all hypothetical.
#32
Posted 20 July 2009 - 08:01 AM
Well, I guess there's only one way to figure out what Asexual means...
Edited by {IP}Pasidon, 20 July 2009 - 08:01 AM.
#33
Posted 20 July 2009 - 07:37 PM
#34
Posted 20 July 2009 - 08:18 PM
Edited by Puppeteer, 20 July 2009 - 08:18 PM.
#35
Posted 21 July 2009 - 01:37 AM
You can have one without the other. Think of Jay and Silent Bob, self described as 'heterosexual life partners'. They clearly love one another, just not in a sexual way...
Or think about prison. A lot of guys having sex with guys while claiming they're straight... It ain't love, but they're still homos.
#37
Posted 21 July 2009 - 04:39 PM
Einstein: "We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
#38
Posted 21 July 2009 - 04:50 PM
No fuel left for the pilgrims
#40
Posted 22 July 2009 - 04:10 AM
If I were a girl, I might be bi.
I'm sure that's what they all say. But there are surgeries to find this out for sure.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users