Announcement from Warner Bros!
#21
Posted 03 December 2009 - 03:41 AM
#23
Posted 03 December 2009 - 04:45 PM
#24
Posted 03 December 2009 - 06:32 PM
#25
Posted 03 December 2009 - 07:11 PM
We'll see what is this all about . The good part is that it's an RPG . I always wanted to play a RPG LOTR game. Enough with strategy and smash games.
Edited by Valaquenta10, 03 December 2009 - 07:12 PM.
#26
Posted 03 December 2009 - 07:24 PM
#27
Posted 03 December 2009 - 07:45 PM
#28
Posted 03 December 2009 - 09:10 PM
I've read in a renowned biography that he sold the movie rights pretty cheap and quick because he didn't think it could ever be made into a movie.Ahem. Tolkien didn't dislike the idea of a movie being made... in fact, quite the opposite. He thought that LotR would be good material for movie-makers. *I read that in a book that my friend gave to me...*
No fuel left for the pilgrims
#29
Posted 03 December 2009 - 09:12 PM
#30
Posted 03 December 2009 - 09:45 PM
#31
Posted 03 December 2009 - 09:47 PM
Edited by Gfire, 03 December 2009 - 09:47 PM.
#32
Posted 03 December 2009 - 09:49 PM
I think the movies are good movies, it's hard to deny, but I am still disappointed by them. They left out my two favourite characters (Glorfindel and Halbarad) and fundamentally changed the third (Faramir). In the book, Faramir was never tempted by the Ring, but in the movie he is. That's pretty terrible if you ask me.
No fuel left for the pilgrims
#33
Posted 03 December 2009 - 09:52 PM
#34
Posted 03 December 2009 - 09:54 PM
Great in movies aren't based on accuracy compared to the book...
Movies are suppose to be entertaning, not 100% accurate... Having a 10 hour long Fellowship of the Ring does not sell, and what do movie makers depend on?
Movies that sell. So why is the FotR 3 hours? Because that's barely acceptable by the majority (or that's what I think anyways)... I would not personally mind if they did 6 movies, one for each sub-book
Point is, the main happenings and plot is nicely portraited in the movies...
[movie rant]
The thing I used to think "fuck the movies" about, was Rohan's portrayal in Two Towers, with Eomer running off, basically
After 2 and a half year of my school, I've grown on the movies decision, and what has to be done to make good movies.. Having Eomer run away with 2000 riders is needed to create a conflict, and a sign of desperation.. The fact that Helm's Deep is vunerable and trapped, isn't really portraited well enough in the books, while the movies make that point clear, and that they NEED Eomer and his riders.. The hour of desperation... If suddenly there was a guy who've we've never seen before or heard about, Erkenbrand, comes with 1000 foot troops, Rohan wouldn't have been portraited as the cavalry nation, and we'd only see a great man of Rohan, that doesn't do more after that really.. He'd be a random person, and that's a no-no in movies, especially those who plays a large role in an event, or something like that
[/movie rant]
The 4th Age version 0.8 has been released: Link
#35
Posted 03 December 2009 - 09:58 PM
Yeah it did, but I thought he was awesome because he was wise enough to see beyond the Ring's temptation right away.It made for some good character developments for Faramir, though.
No fuel left for the pilgrims
#36
Posted 04 December 2009 - 01:29 AM
Einstein: "We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
#37
Posted 04 December 2009 - 04:44 AM
I totally agree, Glorfindel and Halbarad were pretty awesome. Beregond, too. They adding a lot of stuff I would have tossed out for the great things that were in the book. I mean, beyond the whole "doesn't make a good movie" thing, there were some decisions they made I wouldn't have.
Butterfly effect, indeed. If it wasn't for T3A, I never would have looked more closely at LotR (for modding reference, actually,) and I that didn't happen I wouldn't see as many flaws in the films. Full circle.
#38
Posted 04 December 2009 - 08:40 AM
My opinionated 2 cents.
I really don't do requests and my Arnor Soldier is not fit for BFME. Don't ask me for either.
#39
Posted 04 December 2009 - 04:02 PM
But with all this , I can say the Movies still rocks and I'm not disappointed by them.
Peace
Edited by Valaquenta10, 04 December 2009 - 04:03 PM.
#40
Posted 04 December 2009 - 06:23 PM
Hmm.. Maybe I should make a mod focusing on all those cut characters. That would be kinda fun. I mean, Glorfindel, Halbarad and Beregond (beragond?) were like my favorite characters. I wonder if they'd be my favorites if they were in the movie. Maybe I just like them cause they were cut.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users