TDH Balance Thread
#21
Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:20 PM
Azagh-Baruk
Cost: 50
Health: 150
Damage: 12/50
Damage Type: Slash
Attack Rate: 1/second
Damage Reduction vs. Slash: 20/70%
Galadhrim
Cost: 140
Heath: 160
Damage: 15/45
Damge Type: Slash
Attack Rate: 1.25/second
Damage Reduction vs. Slash: 40/60%
So... unupgraded, a Dwarf does 7.2 damage per second against the Elf, killing in about 22 seconds. The Elf does 18.75 damage per second, killing in 8. So, the Elf wins by a fair margin when both are unupgraded, which is good considering base-wise, the Elf costs around 5x as much.
With full upgrades, the Dwarf does 20 DPS, killing in 8 seconds. The Elf does 16.25, killing in 9.2 seconds. So, the Dwarf wins, but not by much.
If you take into account that fifth horde member and calcuclate 4 on 5 though, the Dwarves don't come close. 28 seconds for an unupgraded Azagh Baruk unit to kill the Galadhrim, and a mere 6 seconds for the Elves to kill the Dwarves . With upgrades it's a little closer, 10 seconds versus 6.8.
I really don't do requests and my Arnor Soldier is not fit for BFME. Don't ask me for either.
#22
Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:24 PM
#23
Posted 22 February 2010 - 11:21 PM
Well, I'll just go by your explanation then
please take note that, until further notice, I don't care, so get lost.
#24
Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:27 AM
I really don't do requests and my Arnor Soldier is not fit for BFME. Don't ask me for either.
#25
Posted 06 March 2010 - 04:47 PM
I got the feeling that the damage of the Yeoman Archers was really a bit too high. Perhaps it's just me, but one battalion of them nearly took out a battalion of Uruks.
Don't know about the Galadhrim, they are fine as they are imo. If they even become stronger they'll be OP.
And concerning Gollum, he is a bit too expensive imo. Even Hobbits who are much better than him only cost 100, while Gollum costs 150.
So I would suggest reducing his price to 100 at least.
Forgot to mention the Haradrim Archers. I'm not sure but I think they deal out pike damage when they are crushed by charging cavalry. As they are archers now I think you should remove that.
Edited by BakiNoM, 06 March 2010 - 04:57 PM.
#26
Posted 06 March 2010 - 06:41 PM
Elites die just as easily as peasants. Just think about it.
please take note that, until further notice, I don't care, so get lost.
#27
Posted 06 March 2010 - 07:42 PM
Don't think so...
Btw I don't get the point of your post.
#28
Posted 06 March 2010 - 07:49 PM
Also, remember that Rohan has 400 CP, while Isengard has 800 CP.. If one battalion of uruks can kill a battalion of Archers, they'll only need 400 of the CP in uruks and win...
Not a great example, but what I mean is that archers can shoot many arrows before they even come near, and should kill enough to stand a chance when they're near.. if they're both without upgrades, I would say that uruks should win though..
But it's both's responsibility to send more than just a single battalion though
The 4th Age version 0.8 has been released: Link
#29
Posted 06 March 2010 - 09:44 PM
The Yeoman Archer has a basic damage of 32, while a Gondor Archer deals out 10. That means the Rohan Archer has an attack that is triply stronger (!) than that of the basic Gondor Archer.
Both have the same armour and the same amount of health, yet the Yeomen only cost 50 more.
So the Yeomen even greatly outplay elites like Ithilien Rangers and Galadhrim attack-wise!
I really don't know why EA gave them such an insanely strong attack. Now I hope you agree that their attack should be nerfed.
#30
Posted 06 March 2010 - 09:53 PM
;Yeoman damage is doubled because they miss 50%.
Also
So, I think that somebody might've intended them to hit less than others, but do more damage, but I also saw that Gondor Archers have the same HitPercentage and ScatterRadius, and if they've got 3 times less damage, then I'd say it's a simple mistake..HitPercentage = 100 ;When this weapon is used it will hit exactly 50% of the time.
ScatterRadius = 16.0 ;When this weapon misses it can randomly miss by as much as this distance.
I don't fully know Nertea's intentions though
Edited by Lauri, 06 March 2010 - 09:57 PM.
The 4th Age version 0.8 has been released: Link
#31
Posted 06 March 2010 - 10:12 PM
And now take into consideration that the Rohan Archer has an attack that does thrice more damage, quite unfair.
Guess that mistake appeared because they had that 50%-miss-thingy in an earlier version of the game...
#32
Posted 06 March 2010 - 11:22 PM
There's a lot of stuff re: inaccuracy in the weapon codes, I believe that at some point it played a much larger role in how units behaved, but they took most of it out. Archers have ALWAYS been massively overpowered in RTS games though, all the way back from AoE1.
I really don't do requests and my Arnor Soldier is not fit for BFME. Don't ask me for either.
#33
Posted 07 March 2010 - 02:28 AM
Edited by Spartan184, 07 March 2010 - 02:31 AM.
#34
Posted 07 March 2010 - 09:48 AM
I really don't do requests and my Arnor Soldier is not fit for BFME. Don't ask me for either.
#35
Posted 07 March 2010 - 01:18 PM
#36
Posted 07 March 2010 - 03:53 PM
Edited by Spartan184, 07 March 2010 - 03:58 PM.
#37 Guest_Bungle_*
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:52 AM
The fact they are so devastating against units just feels, well, wrong and (to me anyways) they ruin the game.
All it takes is one shot to wipe out a battalion of upgraded units.
This is more problematic for the dwarves as 1) their units are slow and cant get out the way and 2) no cav to hunt the darn things down quickly!.
Obv the dwarves are slow as a lore/gameplay issue, but to me siege units should only be good against buildings/castles etc.
Are the siege units going to stay the same way?
Also, the mod is fantastic.
More than worth the countless trips to check its progress i made over the years.
A big well done and thanks for releasing such a great mod to the community.
Edited by Radspakr, 27 August 2011 - 11:22 AM.
Added some line breaks for easier reading
#38
Posted 17 March 2010 - 04:23 PM
I used to throw archer accuracy around a lot as a solution to this, but the truth of that is that it has the same overall effect as reducing archer damage (lowering the effective damage per second). This is just nerfing archers into the ground, and I don't think it really helps anymore - then they become underpowered, and they need to be effective against something!
One thing I have been thinking of recently is fiddling with clip sizes. If this was properly managed, it might work well... this would work by giving each archer a "clip" of 15 or so arrows. These can be fired as normal, then they would have to wait a brief period (say 15 seconds) to reload this clip. This would be fine and all, but there are now player UI issues - how does the player tell how much the archers have left in the clip? Without knowing that, you can't accurately predict what your troops can kill, or when to pull them back from the fighting to reload.
I really don't do requests and my Arnor Soldier is not fit for BFME. Don't ask me for either.
#39
Posted 17 March 2010 - 05:30 PM
This would at least nerf the archers a bit, and I do believe that it is the fire arrow upgrade what does let them look OP. If you guys would introduce this for the next patch (that would also make the game more realistic) things would become better I think.
And Nertea, are you planning to introduce the Marksmen Upgrade from the old RA mod into TDH? It was really something that I was waiting for (and I bet it's not only me), being unique and not used by any other mod I know, it would make the game much more interesting. And concerning balance, you would have to invest more resources to actually have a force of archers that would be about the same level as the archers in the as-is state.
#40
Posted 17 March 2010 - 07:23 PM
I will not be adding the accuracy upgrade, for like 6 reasons. 2 of which are in my previous post.
I really don't do requests and my Arnor Soldier is not fit for BFME. Don't ask me for either.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users