Except democracy has many variants. I'm saying ignore direct democracy - you know, majority suppresses minorities and public opinion rules? Like Switzerland, which enabled the banning of minarets (with only a approx. 10% lead). There are other forms - the US would still be a democracy, because the people voted him in and will be able to vote him out, as he won't be able to change the constitution to prevent that from happening. In other words, stop being foolish and scaremongering.You do know that's the first step towards a dictatorship right? Obama may genuinely believe that his plans are for the better of everyone, but that doesn't give him a right to ignore democracy and push his plans all the way through. Dictatorships usually start out this way, with an elected president, who eventually says 'fuck democracy, I know how it really should be done, trust me'. Like the saying goes, 'the road to hell is paved with good intentions'.
Agreed, actually - I was against the whole electoral campaign system right from the off. As I am against our current electoral campaigning (mainly/solely by Cameron). If any Britain gets the opportunity, watch last Wednesday's Question Time. Baroness William, a perfect individual , gave a nice summation of why executive figures aren't right for our country and she mourns the diminishing role of the cabinet. It should apply elsewhere, too - that's why I'm against the concept of a president (and the general trend of personality over politics). Plus you should watch it because Boris Johnson and Carol Vorderman were incredibly rude, and Lord Adonis was so meek. And Will Self poked fun whenever he could. And David Dimbleby is the epitome of awesome.And I'll give a hunk of blame to the media for flashing his fancy "Change will happen" quotes instead of good facts. McCain wasn't my favorite guy either, but I can't say this would of been avoided. Guess we'll never know.
Edited by Puppeteer, 07 March 2010 - 03:19 PM.