Jump to content


Photo

space skirmish


2 replies to this topic

#1 Martin Brúder

Martin Brúder
  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 26 March 2012 - 11:42 AM

I noticed that when I upgrade my fighter factory then I lost access to the barloz class freighters and instead of them I will have access to YT-1300i which is in my opinion even worse variant then the barloz class. It have worse shields and hull but it is "slightly" faster. I dont think that this is wast improvement from the previous version. In the 1.1 version if I remember correctly the YT-1300i was much better shielded and had better hull then the barloz class freighter so why did you decided to change this? It doesnt make a sense to have access to the inferior freighter after FF upgrade. It should be otherwise. Also as I said after the first upgrade I completely lost access to the barloz class freighter. Can you please fix this so the BC will be still available after the FF upgrade?

Thanks

Edited by Martin Brúder, 26 March 2012 - 11:44 AM.


#2 evilbobthebob

evilbobthebob

    evilbobthemapper

  • Project Team
  • 2,304 posts
  • Location:USA
  • Projects:Phoenix Rising Maps
  •  Phoenix Rising Mapping Lead

Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:23 PM

The Barloz-class, along with all freighters, is limited in space skirmish so that the asteroid mining facilities are more important for income. You may simply have built up to the limit. If you mean that you upgraded the station and now you can't build them at all even when you haven't got any, that's a bug. Thanks for the report.

Phoenix Rising, head of mapping. Thanks to everyone who got us to the position below!
Posted Image


#3 Phoenix Rising

Phoenix Rising

    Beyond the Impossible

  • Petrolution Staff
  • 6,509 posts
  • Projects:Phoenix Rising
  •  Mod Leader
  • Division:Petrolution
  • Job:Mod Specialist

Posted 26 March 2012 - 04:29 PM

I'm pretty sure it's the limit kicking in. If the freighters in play die, you can build more. Same for healers.

YT and Barloz stats haven't changed in this release (other than income), but probably need to be reevaluated to your point.



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users