its an interesting topic that can easily provoke alot of people, immigration.
the main problem with immigration these days is prolly culture. we are too lazy to get enough children to be able to support ourselves, and the ones who have enough children have so different cultures that it makes it hard for them to integrate themselves into our socities.
in my opinion i am usually quite liberal in my opinions, but that doesnt mean that i don't see the risks in letting too many immigrate if they are allowed to live as if they lived in their homeland in the new land. firstly there are plenty of laws that would differ, secondly they wouldnt need to even learn the language of the country, and thirdly the differences in social acceptances such as respect and honour and dedication to letting authorities taking care of problems.
naturally, the line between integration and assimilation is one that is not discussed openly. the entire topic is usually a big mess. for example, we don't really worry if we see a polish worker walking down the street you rarely would be able to tell that they are from poland unless they have painted their flag in their face for a football-match. on the other hand, people from the middle east and africa are alot easier to notice for us.
one interesting theory though, how do we react if we see asian immigrants? its not like we have the same fears of them, even though its likely that in the future that China will pwn us all
. i think religious backgrounds has alot to say in todays immigration politics.
edit: figured i add this little topic about the australian prime minister saying that immigrants with HIV should not be allowed in.
http://news.bbc.co.u...fic/6553623.stmit sounds pretty strange in my opinion, unless he fears that every HIV-positive immigrant used to be the village rapist at home i don't see a big political point in this but saving hospitals from spending cash on them.
Edited by duke_Qa, 13 April 2007 - 06:51 PM.