Yes its obvious.95% sure it was Bradley, but nobody counted on Korea getting help from the Chinese. If the Russians and Chinese had not intervened, it would have been a three week war.
Look Saddam was an arsehole too. Thing is he wouldnt even be in power for all we know if you wouldnt have been funding his war effort.Don't tell me your source is that made up death toll of 100,000, because everyone knows that that is a bullshit source that people use to scare normal people. The fact that about 90% of the people accounted for on that tally are unaccounted for in any reports boggles the mind how anyone could find it to be a valid source.
And how many did Saddam kill? How about 100,000 Kurds in one day? Oh but that doesn't count because it's only brought up in anti-Saddam conversations, not anti-America ones.
You think i made that up? Look what i just found on google:Do I have to say it again? Don't make stuff up or come here with a valid source that isn't a propoganda machine encouraging communist revolts. Kim Jong Il will open up the border with artillery, not kindness.
"Thank your buddy Bush Senior for that".June 2000: The North and South Korean leaders hold a historic three day summit in Pyongyang. They sign a pact making a commitment towards reunification and allow reunions of families separated during the Korean War.
September 25, 2000: The defense ministers of South and North Korea meet for talks.
October 2000: U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright holds talks with Kim Jong Il in North Korea.
December 2000: South Korean President Kim Dae-jung is presented with the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his efforts to establish relations with Communist North Korea.
March 2001: South Korean President Kim Dae-jung meets with US President George W. Bush. North Korea cancels ministerial talks with the South after Bush states the North poses a threat to the region and cannot be trusted to honor agreements.
October 2001: North Korea postpones plans to hold reunions of families separated since the Korean War, citing a "warlike situation" in Seoul since the terrorist attacks in the United States.
Really, are you a communist hippie?
China, France, United Kingdom, Israel, and Russia would all have to disarm if the US would. You really think that China will disarm? China, Russia, and Israel? And if China disarms, what about India, Pakistan, and Iran? You can't be so naive to think that the entire world is going to give up nuclear weapons, their only defence against other nuclear weapons, to become some group of hippies, do you?
Sure call me whatever you want. Thing is i dont see a point in maintaining HUNDREDS of nukes today. Is the cold war with Russia still commencing? Does North Korea have 3 thousand nukes at its disposal? Is it rational to bombard a country with a thousand nukes today? Im not an idiot saying "disarm all the nukes today, now, at this moment", i know that they are meant to be a sort of pepper spray to hostile nations, "if you attack ill treat you with this" etc. Speaking of which even Russia is getting rid of their nukes, tho its mainly cause the maitenance cost is ruining their military budget.