Praetor-class Dreadnought
Started by jdk002, Oct 27 2007 01:24 AM
24 replies to this topic
#22
Posted 26 November 2007 - 10:13 AM
Until someone can come up with a Rebellion-style complement system for EaW, complements in PR will remain a game mechanic and nothing more. That means first variant ships get first variant fighters. Believe me, the Executor is deadly enough by itself.
[/quote]
Yup that was a well thought out - and realistic - complement system. Having that in EAW - scary stuff.
You could rewrite imperial doctrines in an instant - but surely that is the point of EAW - you gotta stick with imp doctrine otherwise the game would be completley unbalanced.
Give the imps shielded fighters en-mass and might as well give up and die now.
Anyway, how can you possibly play the imps if you don't consider your pilots and troops to be expendable!
[/quote]
Yup that was a well thought out - and realistic - complement system. Having that in EAW - scary stuff.
You could rewrite imperial doctrines in an instant - but surely that is the point of EAW - you gotta stick with imp doctrine otherwise the game would be completley unbalanced.
Give the imps shielded fighters en-mass and might as well give up and die now.
Anyway, how can you possibly play the imps if you don't consider your pilots and troops to be expendable!
#23
Posted 26 November 2007 - 10:50 PM
Well, if I did it, I'm not sure I would force hyperdrive-capable fighters to be bound to a carrier like Rebellion did. So in that case, the limitations would mostly be on the Empire.Yup that was a well thought out - and realistic - complement system. Having that in EAW - scary stuff.
You could rewrite imperial doctrines in an instant - but surely that is the point of EAW - you gotta stick with imp doctrine otherwise the game would be completley unbalanced.
Give the imps shielded fighters en-mass and might as well give up and die now.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users