uh. ok?
so. cause 1 tier 2 defense could outrange another is a bad thing...? so a bit of diversity is bad...? ok... whatever you say.
Unbalanced universal defenses =/= Diversity
LC/EA/LB having access to unique defenses like Smoke Turrets, Coordnodes, and Plasmerizer = Diversity
and why do i have to disprove this...?
huh o_O (we dont have anti air aircraft for allies and soviets that can be produced at airfields yet if my facts are right.) so how are my facts wrong when you just said that its right...? all fixed wing aircraft can't attack other air units that are produced from the airfields... which you said and i said that that we dont have anti aircraft for the allies and soviets that can't be produced from the airfields...??? your logic is different...
Because this counters everything you say about Teratorns being expensive you said "ok so lets spend 2900+ when our bases are getting obliterated not to mention the delays and so on :O yes i know having an army is important but we all play differently". You also brought up the topic of fixed jet aircraft not attacking air units not me, stop lying
"we also dont have anti air aircraft for allies and soviets that can be produced at airfields"
fragile ego? nope. i just defend myself when others attempt to hang crap on me, as you would most likely do as well. are you daft -_- ?
Sure, I guess the banter is too much for you. Sorry if it offends you.
regardless of it being my fault. 1:30 is more than enough to destroy a frontline defense, easily leaving ya base exposed.so the likelyhood of ya entire base not getting ruined after ya loose ya frontline is extremely likely...
Which is why you have units to defend your frontline defenses. European Alliance and Last Bastion have units that excel at this.
well. of course. thats obvious.
Well if it's obvious stop using "my playstyle is this way so we have to change this to accommodate it" as a defense for your suggestions.
its not the easiest thing to do to defend squishy anti infiltrator units.
Yeah it is you just don't bother to defend them.
well... if ya say so...
You are literally suggesting to using tier 3 Kirovs and air units to counter your OP suggestion of tier 2 Psychic Towers. That is not a good defense for your suggestion.
um. where do quetzals come into this...? i talked about em before... but not with you.
Whether it involves me or not is irrelevant, Quetzals are much more expensive and take more to set up their prerequisites than anti-air units and you were complaining how churning them out is too much of a chore for you.
ok. fine then. everythings for PvP. there. u happy ._.
where am i preaching o_O im not worshiping anything!!! also im pretty sure you'd complain if you were well... not able to play at ya best.
Your absurd suggestions say otherwise.
Preaching doesn't always involve religion, preaching can also mean to advocate a belief or course of action which you just did when you said to micromanage other expendable units to shield fragile Barracudas/Basilisks from your suggested OP anti-air tier 3 defenses yet you complain about churning out units and moving them around. Basically you are being a hypocrite here.
wow. +1 range on prism towers and shrike nests is absurd. just... wow... ( sarcastic clapping here ) just... BE REAL! is +1 range that big of an issue you have to call someone lazy for enjoying being defensive. i also dont ask to be accommodated for directly. its just an idea. if it hurts you that much then... its not best to reply then... just... dont reply... its not that big of a deal if 2 small base defenses get a slight buff. is it?
i guess i can't compete with such a good argument... i give up ._. nothing i can think of can POSSIBLY beat the "git gud" argument ( more sarcastic claps here -_- ) . just. come on. do better than the "git gud argument"
You literally suggested giving anti-air attack to tier 3 defenses, capping sabotage power time, and Psychic Towers available at tier 2, stop portraying all your suggestions as if they were minor buffs, they weren't. Yes all your suggested buffs are absurd. There is nothing wrong with criticism if you are not open to criticism then what are you doing in a forum where discussions can lead to disagreements? The "git gud" comment was nothing more than banter, it wasn't an argument at all.
well if they never run out then that a programming flaw. all CnC A.I's a pre-programmed with the same income as everyone else and can all run out of income. otherwise that literally creates an unfair advantage o_O geez. regardless i still like the mod but if they can't run out then theres a problem in my opinion.
If resources is too much for you then play on a bigger map with lots of gems and ore and you can set the resources at a much higher level. You also mentioned that the AI isn't smart in one of your previous comment. the fact that you can steal endless amount of money from the cheating AI and outsmart them puts you at a better advantage when facing them.
ern. why do i have to obey/do everything you want me to? just.... ok? uh... i can try.... but its tough
They are suggested actions, not demands.
it was only 1 minute and you didn't have to worry about too many infiltrators and every faction owning one.
The time for sabotaged power is best left the way it is just like in the original game.
once again. be real. 1+ range isn't a big deal. you are making everything seem over-dramatic.
Still unbalanced though.
well i gotta chat back ya know. i can't just sit there and get thrown around. what. do you want me to be some mindless machine and get picked on by people such as yourself?
You don't respond well to criticism, do you and since when have I picked on you, at worst I just called you a newbie thats it.
PFFT! you call ya-self a veteran!!!! well. i suppose you may be one but... lets recap.... its as if ya just dont want anyone to talk about changing something. like... seriously.... come on. you have also been rude about it to... i even became the bigger person and attempted to get off the subject by talking about a new faction or something. then ya only come in to make things worse. i have no reason to reply beyond this point. i appreciate the random advice/info splodges but you should have just kept it to the info. you didn't need to say anything else...
So far you have misrepresented a lot of things that I said, lied (for example downplayed your suggestions to make it seem like it's not a big issue), you used sarcasm to mock me, accused me of bullying you and being overdramatic for simply criticizing your suggestions. I highly doubt that makes you 'the bigger person'.