I agree... Infantry needs atleast some anti-tank vehichle. It doesn't have to be an awsome unit, but strong enouigh that 3 could fight 2 battlemasters. In the same strenght area as the AirF tank
I hear what you guys are saying... but I respectfully disagree. I think having a vehicle that's used to outdo other vehicles is going against what infantry generals should be about.
I was just watching a Discovery Channel special on how Egypt handled some of it's early battles against Israel in the 60's or 70's. And apparently, Egypt did very well against Israel's tanks for a while, because they were very good at getting well armed infantry to surround Israeli tanks, and use their RPG and other explosives. The point is that some tanks are not so good at beating infantry and some infantry are much better at beating tanks.
So if you feel infantry general needs some more anti-tank work, I think it should be given without making a stronger armor vehicle. Maybe if infantry had the same "laser lock" rockets as US infantry does in standard ZH. That way, it takes more micromanagement, but when anti-tank units "dig in", they pack more punch than other antitank units.