New tank preview
Started by Eradicator, Dec 09 2003 10:11 PM
14 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 December 2003 - 10:11 PM
But does it have to be "totally" accurate. BF1942 is a widely popular game and they got by with it
#4
Posted 01 November 2003 - 10:14 AM
I'm unsure what artillery piece this is... A M7 Priest?
#7
Posted 03 November 2003 - 09:22 AM
sorry for the mistake, Mongoose, :bluch:
but my remark still stands about this model...
I'm wondering why you post things like that.
I know some of you guys can do a lot better then that...
but my remark still stands about this model...
I'm wondering why you post things like that.
I know some of you guys can do a lot better then that...
#9
Posted 06 November 2003 - 06:17 PM
Apart from the model doesnt look like a Priest...
#11
Posted 10 December 2003 - 09:42 AM
Now that's what I like to hear !!Yes nllnBut does it have to be "totally" accurate.
#13
Posted 10 December 2003 - 08:15 PM
My philosophy is that, if you make or do something you might aswell try to do it right from the start.
If you learn to model for example, making your first model will take you much longer that way, I agree, but you'll have learned a lot more then when you slam something together to get a fast-fast result...
It's not about being a history nerd or not, but about a general attitude in life.
We all appreciate a job well done, wheter it comes from your garagist or your baker, no? So why not impose the same rules you like to see imposed on others?
If you learn to model for example, making your first model will take you much longer that way, I agree, but you'll have learned a lot more then when you slam something together to get a fast-fast result...
It's not about being a history nerd or not, but about a general attitude in life.
We all appreciate a job well done, wheter it comes from your garagist or your baker, no? So why not impose the same rules you like to see imposed on others?
#15
Posted 10 December 2003 - 08:49 PM
Detail, we're a bit on a different wave length here:
I'm realist enough to know that you never or rarely get something perfect from a first try. That's why I said "try to do it right from the start" and not "make it perfect from the start".
You're focusing on the end result while I take more importance to the attitude taken towards starting a job.
Let me re-engineer my previous statement to illustrate what i mean: if you don't care about making the best of it, then don't try at all...
It sounds a lot more aggressive when put this way, so that's why I preferred the other description.. :bluch:
This has nothing to do with perfection, as perfection is only obtained through experience or an insanely lucky strike.
I'm realist enough to know that you never or rarely get something perfect from a first try. That's why I said "try to do it right from the start" and not "make it perfect from the start".
You're focusing on the end result while I take more importance to the attitude taken towards starting a job.
Let me re-engineer my previous statement to illustrate what i mean: if you don't care about making the best of it, then don't try at all...
It sounds a lot more aggressive when put this way, so that's why I preferred the other description.. :bluch:
This has nothing to do with perfection, as perfection is only obtained through experience or an insanely lucky strike.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users