880 replies to this topic

[link.the.first]

I thought that thing was smaller than that, oh well.

It doesn't really look like the uber-modern design I would expect in the game though, and in order to be stealth missiles have to be stored internally, so I would say the UCAV should have a different model.




One of those, maybe?

More designs

[ZeroSamuraiX]

very kewl
limited attack capabilies will keep some balance

[Ace22]

Who's played Empire Earth?

Because that first fighter is a unit in that game, 'cept it's unmanned.

[Delta24US]

i did, its an alright game. PR rules it tho

[link.the.first]

So what do you guys think of these designs? Should we pick a bunch and start a poll with them?

[Ace22]

Yeah, but what are we going to use them for? (Sorry, idiocy mode activated as I play Electric Funeral on my guitar.)

[link.the.first]

the UCAV, unless Vanguard already picked and finalized a design.

[Ace22]

Ok, what about weapons?

[link.the.first]

Pretty much missiles that are extremely accurate against both ground and air targets. And they have a lot of power behind them because the computer on the UCAV programs them to hit a critical area. However, they have almost no splash damage.

[7th_Panzer]

The US actuallly already built and tested one, called the X-45 I believe. It doesn't look like those.

[link.the.first]

That?

I think the other ones look cooler though.

[Jsmooth13]

but since when does vanguard listen to polls???

lol
just kidding Vanguard sir....

Anyway, link i like both designs for different things...

The top ones are more curbed and the bottom ones are more realistic... could you combine the 2 ideas????

[link.the.first]

The top could be the UCAV fighter and the bottom the bomber.

[Jsmooth13]

that'd be cool

[7th_Panzer]

Thats it. If you see one in real life, it looks quite sinister. And I think there should be only one UCAV, capable of firing AIM-9Xs and Hellfires.

[link.the.first]

I think these look cooler though.

They should fire the AIM-120 AMRAAM Slammers though, Sidewinders are a little dated now. Besides, these would probably be more effective against ground without compromising air superiority.

[Ace22]

No, 7nth is right about the AIM-9Xs, as they are a new version of the Sidewinder and they would go well with Hellfires.

[link.the.first]

Are they better than Slammers?

Also I think it should either have only one type of missile or a weapon that can hit ground or air and bombs, since if they have air-ground only and air-air only rockets then they will stay patrolling an area even after using up all of their ground missiles because they still have some air missiles left.

[Jsmooth13]

yeah

[SPETSNAZ]

I agree

Someone should put some flyin units for GLA.

Including helicopters.

In the Middle-East, most countries use a helicopter called Mi 24 "Hind", as u know the Russia is a corrupted country, soo they sell weapons,vehicles and aircraft to terrorists includin like Afghanistan...., soo the "Hind" its an assault transport and gunship, and The Mi-24 is a close counterpart to the American AH-64 Apache.

U can see it on http://www.fas.org/m...c/row/mi-24.htm

Soo i suggest to have an attack helicopter for the GLA.

Speaking for the jets, i suggest to put some MiG units, they are also appear in the Middle-East aircraft devision.

Soo if anyone agrees with this proposition, just type it down or if u have someting better in mind, but i suggest ad least try to create the "Hind" as there air support unit.