Imperial Planetary Units
#22
Posted 25 February 2008 - 12:34 AM
What about these?
Tank droid
Mmm...I'd love to see this, but it's freaken` huge...twice as tall as an AT-AT...also I have no clue wtf a particle cannon looks like...maybe I need to read Dark Empire. Does it show it firing?
Compact Assault Vehicle/wheeled PX-10
Couldn't hurt, it's quite cute.
Guardian-class patrol ship
Can I have a wookiepedia link to the article? That looks like a modified Mobquet Medium Transport.
Heavy Assault Vehicle/wheeled A6 Juggernaut
I can agree to this, just make sure it actually has good weapons not like the pathetic piece of crap of a "Juggernaut" on vanilla FoC.
Edited by Kacen, 25 February 2008 - 01:05 AM.
#23
Posted 25 February 2008 - 12:58 AM
FireHawk Heavy Repulsor Tank.
UT-AT. A few were used.
XP-38 landspeeder. Later Upgrades could lightly arm it.
"Welcome to the jolly old death star."
"Vader gets the plesure of killing someone while we get to stay among the living. Private Perkins overhere has been stranged over 30 times haven't you Perkins." "Good man."
#25
Posted 25 February 2008 - 01:29 AM
"Welcome to the jolly old death star."
"Vader gets the plesure of killing someone while we get to stay among the living. Private Perkins overhere has been stranged over 30 times haven't you Perkins." "Good man."
#26
Posted 25 February 2008 - 01:46 AM
Guardian-class patrol ship
Can I have a wookiepedia link to the article? That looks like a modified Mobquet Medium Transport.Heavy Assault Vehicle/wheeled A6 Juggernaut
I can agree to this, just make sure it actually has good weapons not like the pathetic piece of crap of a "Juggernaut" on vanilla FoC.
Just look for Guardian-class patrol ship and it'll appear.
About the Juggernaut, I'm sure PR will stick to canon, and according to it, the Jueggernaut has a lot of weapons.
#27
Posted 25 February 2008 - 05:35 PM
And i'd love to see a fully working NEW Juggernaut .
Edited by Kalo Shin, 25 February 2008 - 05:45 PM.
#28
Posted 25 February 2008 - 07:36 PM
This definitely needs to go in...
Century tank "TIE Crawler"
http://starwars.wiki...ki/Century_tank
The medium blaster cannons could be like those on the TIE Mauler but the Turbolaser could be just that...a turbolaser.
Could have relatively weak armor for it's size.
I agree with you 100% regarding the implementation of the TIE Crawler. Actually, I've always wondered why Petro used their own non-canon TIE Mauler instead of the canon TIE Crawler.
By the way, I like the new walker ideas too but, as everyone else has already mentioned, animations will cause problems; maybe repulsor-based vehicles are a more feasible addition.
#29
Posted 25 February 2008 - 08:53 PM
I agree with you 100% regarding the implementation of the TIE Crawler. Actually, I've always wondered why Petro used their own non-canon TIE Mauler instead of the canon TIE Crawler.
Wondered the same thing myself. Actually in general seriously I'm actually starting to develop a pet peeve for game developers who invent new vehicles JUST for Star Wars games when theres EU stuff that could have filled those niches quite nicely. This practice by game developers leads to canonical problems. I mean, seriously was the invention of the T2-B and the T4-B even necessary?
I mean they're supposed to be upgraded from the T1-B and the T3-B yet much of Empire at War takes place way before Force Commander...it makes no sense...it leads to horrid inconsistency.
That and the fact I find the T1-B and the T3-B to be way more effective than the T2-B and the T4-B...but I'll blame that on different game mechanics.
The T2-B's are horrid vehicles, I swear. Completely useless for anything other than mobile distractions. Their durability through shields is their one saving grace, but when the guns do jack shit what it's worth other than a decoy?
And not to mention, they're ugly as sin. The T1-B's are much nicer looking. The T4-B looks alright though it doesn't feel Star Wars-ish to me...but yeah it was designed as an homage to the Mammoth tank from C&C so go figure.
By the way, I like the new walker ideas too but, as everyone else has already mentioned, animations will cause problems; maybe repulsor-based vehicles are a more feasible addition.
Walkers are a significant part of the Imperial military to leave them out would be blasphemy!
Edit: Please be mindful of language.
Edited by Phoenix Rising, 26 February 2008 - 09:05 AM.
#30
Posted 25 February 2008 - 10:15 PM
I Understand the T2-B because somthing had to be between T1-B and T3-B but the T4-B is just in there for balance and a squad of T4-Bs gets destroyed by the AT-AT. Not like what it was in the game.I mean they're supposed to be upgraded from the T1-B and the T3-B yet much of Empire at War takes place way before Force Commander...it makes no sense...it leads to horrid inconsistency.
I don't know they did not put in the crawler when the mauler is almost the same. Also walkers are a staple of the Imperial Army because of their usefulness you have to put them in. Not all of them but some of the more known ones.
"Welcome to the jolly old death star."
"Vader gets the plesure of killing someone while we get to stay among the living. Private Perkins overhere has been stranged over 30 times haven't you Perkins." "Good man."
#31
Posted 25 February 2008 - 10:46 PM
The T4-B looks alright though it doesn't feel Star Wars-ish to me...
Yeah, I know what you mean. The T4-Bs remind me of those tanks used in the Terminator movies.
Walkers are a significant part of the Imperial military to leave them out would be blasphemy!
I'm not saying don't include walkers, I was pointing out the difficulty (namely, the work-hours) of animating the dozens of vastly different models of walkers that are being suggested. Just pointing out the obvious I guess.
I do like the idea of having more flying vehicles; makes land battles more dynamic and less monotonous.
Edited by Valter, 26 February 2008 - 02:23 AM.
#32
Posted 25 February 2008 - 11:02 PM
Well it kinda looked like it was rolling and the feet moved to fast but the model mas good and if he did make a 2nd one it would be good. It just needed a little work. I think Avenger did good work for the modding community but this just was not his best.Why are you guys insulting Avengers Animations for the AT-TE? They're very good, he just didn't make V2 which would have included turning animations like he said.
Personally I liked the T4-B but it was just overpowered (Though not as bad as the Zann tanks and missile platforms.). Also the T2-B does have its uses such as being faster then a AT-ST though the gun was underpowered.
Yeh and some of them have a lot of legs. The AT-OT has 8!I was pointing out the difficulty (namely, the work-hours) of animating the dozens of vastly different models of walkers that are being suggested. Just pointing out the obvious I guess.
Edited by TheEmpire, 25 February 2008 - 11:03 PM.
"Welcome to the jolly old death star."
"Vader gets the plesure of killing someone while we get to stay among the living. Private Perkins overhere has been stranged over 30 times haven't you Perkins." "Good man."
#34
Posted 25 February 2008 - 11:52 PM
"Welcome to the jolly old death star."
"Vader gets the plesure of killing someone while we get to stay among the living. Private Perkins overhere has been stranged over 30 times haven't you Perkins." "Good man."
#36
Posted 26 February 2008 - 04:49 AM
#38
Posted 26 February 2008 - 09:12 AM
I haven't really delved this far into land combat yet, but I'll keep it in mind. Thanks for the offer.Done at 702 Polys! =D This was meant for my personal Mod but if PR wants it i'll give it :o.
#40 Guest_Kaleb Graff_*
Posted 11 March 2008 - 09:13 PM
Reply to this topic
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users